PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2022ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam)189 citationsOpen Access

Effect of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement on All-Cause Mortality in Patients With Aortic Stenosis

TFTimothy FairbairnIKIan KempAYAndrea S. Young

Key Points

  • To compare the effect of transcatheter aortic valve implantation against surgical aortic valve replacement on all-cause mortality in patients with aortic stenosis.
  • Randomized clinical trial registered under identifier ISRCTN57819173.
  • Evaluated patients diagnosed with aortic stenosis undergoing either transcatheter aortic valve implantation or surgical aortic valve replacement.
  • Specific quantitative outcome data, event rates, and effect estimates are not reported in the available trial record.

Abstract

ImportanceTranscatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a less invasive alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement and is the treatment of choice for patients at high operative risk. The role of TAVI in patients at lower risk is unclear.ObjectiveTo determine whether TAVI is noninferior to surgery in patients at moderately increased operative risk.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this randomized clinical trial conducted at 34 UK centers, 913 patients aged 70 years or older with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis and moderately increased operative risk due to age or comorbidity were enrolled between April 2014 and April 2018 and followed up through April 2019.InterventionsTAVI using any valve with a CE mark (indicating conformity of the valve with all legal and safety requirements for sale throughout the European Economic Area) and any access route (n = 458) or surgical aortic valve replacement (surgery; n = 455).Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 1 year. The primary hypothesis was that TAVI was noninferior to surgery, with a noninferiority margin of 5% for the upper limit of the 1-sided 97.5% CI for the absolute between-group difference in mortality. There were 36 secondary outcomes (30 reported herein), including duration of hospital stay, major bleeding events, vascular complications, conduction disturbance requiring pacemaker implantation, and aortic regurgitation.ResultsAmong 913 patients randomized (median age, 81 years IQR, 78 to 84 years; 424 46% were female; median Society of Thoracic Surgeons mortality risk score, 2.6% IQR, 2.0% to 3.4%), 912 (99.9%) completed follow-up and were included in the noninferiority analysis. At 1 year, there were 21 deaths (4.6%) in the TAVI group and 30 deaths (6.6%) in the surgery group, with an adjusted absolute risk difference of −2.0% (1-sided 97.5% CI, −∞ to 1.2%;P Conclusions and RelevanceAmong patients aged 70 years or older with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis and moderately increased operative risk, TAVI was noninferior to surgery with respect to all-cause mortality at 1 year.Trial Registrationisrctn.com Identifier:ISRCTN57819173

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fairbairn et al. (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6995afa083d686757580ccebhttps://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.5776
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper