PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Yang–Mills Mass Gap Program v10. 10 — Main paper + strictₛimulation sealed witness packet (audited interface)

View Full Paper
BLByoungwoo Lee

Key Points

  • The aim is to establish a robust framework for the Yang-Mills Mass Gap Program and enhance the reproducibility of computational results.
  • Released the Yang-Mills Mass Gap Program v10.10 with a sealed witness packet.
  • Implemented strict simulation profiles for audit and verification processes.
  • Provided detailed reports verifying adherence to standards for simulation and data integrity.
  • Simulation audit passed with the strict simulation profile.
  • Mandatory verifiers confirmed the integrity of various simulation reports.
  • Inclusion of a sealed packet enhances reproducibility through rigorous auditing.

Abstract

# OverviewThis record releases the **Yang–Mills Mass Gap Program v10. 10** (PDF + TeX) together with a**sealed strictₛimulation witness packet** implementing an *audited certificate interface*. Included artifacts: - Main paper: `YMMGᵥ10. 10. pdf`- Sealed witness packet (ZIP): `YMMGₚktᵥ10. 10ₛtrictₛimulationₛealed. zip`- Hash / change summary: `YMMGₚktᵥ10. 10ₛtrictₛimulationₛealeddiffₛummary. txt` # Closed results (strictₛimulation witness) The sealed packet ships a strict-simulation anchor report: - `results/e5ₘinᵣeport. json` with - `mode = simulation` - `interfaceᵢd = "E5-min/v1. 4"` - `coverageₛlack = 0`- Mechanical audit is fail-closed and passes: - `python3 -B scripts/auditₐll. py --packetᵣoot. --report results/e5ₘinᵣeport. json --profile strictₛimulation` returns `PASS` (`results/auditᵣeport. json: ok=true`). - Mandatory verifiers are included and pass: - Verifier2 (independent checker): `results/verifier2ᵣeport. json` - Verifier3 (rational): `results/verifier3ᵣationalᵣeport. json` - Verifier4 (interval/decimal): `results/verifier4ᵢntervalᵣeport. json`- Instantiation bridge artifacts are bound and audited: - `results/pbₚathcertificate. json` - `results/pbᵢnstantiationᵣeport. json`- Packet-wide digests are sealed: - `manifest. json` and `manifestcore. json` (SHA256-bound file list) # What's new in this v10. 10 re-upload (sealed witness add-on) - A concrete **strictₛimulation sealed witness ZIP** is now shipped as part of the record. - The anchor report was rebuilt to satisfy the `E5-min/v1. 4` interface and strict binding rules (raw samples/summary replay, domain binding, configs-dir manifest, pb-instantiation digest alignment). - Verifier2 was updated to accept both `e5-min-report/v1. 3` and `v1. 4`, matching the v1. 4 interval-upgrade step. # Reproducibility (quick start) Unzip the sealed packet and run: 1) `bash scripts/finalₛeal. sh strictₛimulation`2) `python3 -B scripts/auditₐll. py --packetᵣoot. --report results/e5ₘinᵣeport. json --profile strictₛimulation` Any missing file, schema mismatch, digest mismatch, or verifier failure yields `FAIL`. # Artifact fingerprints- `YMMGₚktᵥ10. 10ₛtrictₛimulationₛealed. zip` - SHA256: 1340dd05af280b7d2c8ff8b60193a1b10895a6d624d6ea17b04bfe749fc1f1ae - bytes: 3046352- `YMMGₚktᵥ10. 10ₛtrictₛimulationₛealeddiffₛummary. txt` - SHA256: 5da9b30e62c603b3eba9c2f14b1d913fedd51b8a9887f0a043ddc9a099ac9973 # Scope & non-toy statusThis release provides an **audited proof interface** and a **sealed strictₛimulation witness**. The strictₛimulation profile is an internal simulation anchor (not an external observational dataset). A separate profile (`physicsₛtrict`) is designed to bind external references/datasets with `status=REAL`via `results/externalₛourceₙote. json` and hash-checked file inclusion. # KeywordsYang–Mills, mass gap, SU (2), lattice gauge theory, Wilson action, Osterwalder–Schrader, certificate, audited computation, reproducibility, interval arithmetic, rational verification, manifest SHA256

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Byoungwoo Lee (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a8a9ecb39a600b3efa27https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18675773
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper