PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 2026Andrology3 citationsOpen Access

Microfluidic Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (MICSI): A Novel Platform for Sperm Isolation, Selection, and Injection Into Oocytes

View Full Paper
MDMehran DabiriDGDale M. GossSVSA. Vasilescu

Key Points

  • To evaluate the efficacy of a microfluidic ICSI platform in selecting and injecting high-quality sperm into oocytes.
  • Developed a microfluidic ICSI (MICSI) platform for sperm processing.
  • Integrated motility and hyaluronic acid (HA) binding-based selection in a single-use device.
  • Measured sperm DNA fragmentation index, motility, binding score, and morphology for evaluation.
  • The MICSI device selected spermatozoa with significantly higher progressive motility (p < 0.0001).
  • Sperm morphology was found to be better in the MICSI selected population (p < 0.0001).
  • Lower DNA fragmentation index (DFI) was associated with the MICSI device compared to traditional methods (p < 0.0001).

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Infertility is a pressing global health concern, affecting one in six couples worldwide. The failure rate for assisted reproductive technologies (ART) cycles remains at approximately 78%, with limited improvements often attributed to a lack of technological innovation. Sperm processing, a crucial component of ART success and offspring health, has seen minimal technical advancement, and current “gold‐standard” methods such as density gradient centrifugation (DGC) carry risks of iatrogenic injury and DNA damage. Objectives Microfluidic sperm selection technologies have shown promise in leveraging sperm's unique motility behaviors by mimicking the female reproductive tract's microarchitecture. Methods In this study, we introduce a microfluidic ICSI (MICSI) platform by integrating microfluidic technology into the form factor of commercially available ICSI dishes, to integrate semen processing, motility and hyaluronic acid (HA) binding‐based sperm selection, and oocyte insemination capacity on one single‐use consumable. Sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI), motility, binding score, and sperm morphology were measured to evaluate the performance of the MICSI device compared to DGC and DGC plus HA binding. Results Practically, the MICSI device was able to select a population of spermatozoa from raw semen with higher progressive motility ( p < 0.0001), better morphology ( p < 0.0001), and lower DFI ( p < 0.0001). When compared to the conventional DGC, the MICSI device produced spermatozoa with significantly higher progressive motility ( p < 0.0001) and lower DFI ( p < 0.0001). Discussion and Conclusion This data show that the MICSI device may offer a clinically applicable alternative for both selecting high‐quality sperm for injection into oocytes and providing a platform to do so.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dabiri et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9d27482488d673cd2dbahttps://doi.org/10.1111/andr.70198
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Sperm quality metrics were improved by a biomimetic microfluidic selection platform compared to swim-up methods2023 · 58 citations
  2. 2Sperm surface changes and their consequences for sperm transit through the female reproductive tract2020 · 19 citations
  3. 3How to improve IVF–ICSI outcome by sperm selection2006 · 221 citations
  4. 4A rapidly prototyped lung-on-a-chip model using 3D-printed molds2019 · 112 citations
  5. 5Extent of nuclear DNA damage in ejaculated spermatozoa impacts on blastocyst development after in vitro fertilization2004 · 411 citations