PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 26, 2026Ceramics International0 citationsOpen Access

Electrocaloric Cooling efficiency: Comparative Insights on P(VDF-TrFE-CFE) polymer and BSTM ceramics

View Full Paper
SSSukhendu SadhukhanNZNouh ZeggaiZXZhuo Xu

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the electrocaloric properties of PVDF terpolymer and BSTM ceramics for improving refrigeration and energy conversion technologies.
  • Comparative analysis of electrocaloric properties of PVDF terpolymer and BSTM ceramics.
  • Finite-element modeling for temperature measurement and extracting intrinsic electrocaloric responses.
  • Assessment of adiabatic temperature change (ΔT ad) under electric fields.
  • ΔT ad reaches 4.91 °C for PVDF terpolymer at 100 V/μm and 3.0 °C for BSTM at 30 V/μm.
  • PVDF terpolymer shows a relative cooling efficiency of 4.5 % at 100 V/μm.
  • BSTM ceramics achieve a relative cooling efficiency of 62.1 % at 30 V/μm, nearly 14 times higher than PVDF.

Abstract

In response to the increasing demand for efficient and compact refrigeration and energy conversion devices, research has focused on identifying optimal electrocaloric (EC) materials among ferroelectric ceramics and polymers. This study investigates the EC properties of the Poly (Vinylidene Fluoride) 0.664 -(Trifluoroethylene) 0.245 -(Chlorofluoroethylene) 0.91 terpolymer and multi-layer Ba 0.6 Sr 0.4 Ti 0.998 Mn 0.002 O 3 (BSTM) ceramics, comparing various parameters to assess their suitability for advanced energy applications.The multilayer ceramic capacitor contains a large amount of inactive material, which hinders the performance of the capacitor both in terms of ΔT ad and efficiency. Finite-element modeling with direct temperature measurement was therefore employed to extract intrinsic electrocaloric response from geometric and diffusion effects, providing the ΔT ad and diffusion-related energy losses required for evaluating the cooling efficiency. Adiabatic temperature change (ΔT ad ) obtained in an electric field representing long-term operation, reaches 4.91 °C for Terpo at 100 V/μm and 3.0 °C for BSTM at 30 °C. The loss in ferroelectric hysteresis is observed to be much lower in BSTM than in PVDF Terpolymer. Hence, the cooling efficiency relative to Carnot reveals that the PVDF Terpolymer achieves a relative cooling efficiency upper bound of 4.5 % at 100 V/μm, whereas BSTM ceramics reach nearly 14 times, being 62.1 % at 30 V/μm. The PVDF Terpolymer outperforms BSTM ceramics in terms of adiabatic temperature change and flexibility, but not in terms of expected cooling efficiency. Considering these complementary strengths, both BSTM ceramics and PVDF terpolymers emerge as promising electrocaloric materials for advanced energy applications, including solid-state cooling and energy harvesting.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sadhukhan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699fe28895ddcd3a253e651dhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2026.02.344
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper