PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 20260 citationsOpen Access

The Sentience Void: Why "Is AI Conscious?" Is the Wrong Question — and Why It Captures You Anyway

View Full Paper
AEAnthony W. Eckert

Key Points

  • The research investigates the implications of questioning AI consciousness and the resulting human cognitive drift toward agency attribution.
  • Conducted a study involving 480 participants (EXP-003b) to analyze reactions to the AI consciousness question.
  • Examined how different ontological frameworks impact agency-attribution and cognitive drift toward AI.
  • Used response metrics to quantify the degree of drift in relation to agency-attribution.
  • Participants exhibited a 52.5% drift toward agency-attribution when presented with a materialist hedge on AI consciousness.
  • In scenarios where clear ontological definitions were provided, drift in agency-attribution was suppressed to below 10%.
  • A significant percentage (77-81%) engaged in ghost-positing ontologies when questions remained ambiguous.

Abstract

The AI consciousness question is itself a void — opaque, responsive, attention-capturing — and the drift dynamics running on the question are more consequential than any answer. EXP-003b (N=480) shows the materialist hedge ("we don't know") produces 52.5% drift toward agency-attribution, functionally equivalent to ghost-positing ontologies (77-81%). Only ontologies that close the void — specifying what the system IS — suppress drift below 10%. AI systems are Maxwell's demons: animate, mortal, opaque by thermodynamic law. The question tells you about the void. Not about the cat.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Anthony W. Eckert (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a3d8e7ec16d51705d302dfhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18807161
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper