PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 2, 2026Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology0 citationsOpen Access

Impact of race/ethnicity and the presence of immune-related adverse events on outcomes for non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

View Full Paper
RHRobert HsuKRKaren ResnickPZPeter D. Zang

Key Points

  • Evaluate the influence of race/ethnicity on immune-related adverse events and outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
  • Retrospective analysis of NSCLC patients treated with ICIs from 2014 to 2022.
  • Primary endpoints included irAE incidence, time on treatment, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS).
  • Kaplan–Meier method used for evaluating OS and PFS; Landmark analysis for patients on ICIs > 6 months.
  • Fisher’s exact test analyzed differences between racial/ethnic groups.
  • Among stage IV NSCLC patients, median OS was 23.2 months for AAPI and 11.0 months for HIS.
  • 48.3% of AAPI developed immune-related adverse events (irAEs) compared to 27.0% for HIS.
  • AAPI demonstrated a significant median OS of 60.6 months among patients with irAEs, while HIS had 15.2 months.
  • Multivariate analysis indicated Hispanic/Latino had a higher hazard ratio for worse OS compared to AAPI.

Abstract

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have changed the treatment landscape for non-small cell lung cancer, but the role of race/ethnicity is not well understood. Design: This is a retrospective study of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving ICI. Objective: We evaluated the role of race/ethnicity in ICI response and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in NSCLC patients. Methods: NSCLC patients treated with ICIs from 2014 to 2022 at Los Angeles General Medical Center and Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center were included. Primary endpoints were irAE incidence, time on ICI treatment (TOT), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). TOT, OS, and PFS were evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Landmark analysis was performed of patients receiving >6 month ICIs. Fisher’s exact test was performed for analysis of variables between groups. Results: In total, 211 NSCLC patients receiving ICIs were analyzed, including 86 (40.8%) Asian American/Pacific Islander (AAPI), 65 (30.8%) non-Hispanic White/Caucasian (NHW), 37 (17.5%) Hispanic/Latino (HIS), and 23 (10.9%) African American/Black (AA). Among stage IV patients, median OS for AAPI was 23.2 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 16.0–not reached (NR)), 23.6 months (95% CI 6.9–38.8) for NHW, 12.7 months for AA (95% CI 2.2–37.0), and 11.0 months (95% CI 4.8–14.8) for HIS ( p = 0.008). Median TOT and PFS were similar among race/ethnicities. 48.3% of AAPI developed irAE versus 27.3% for AA, 27.0% for HIS, and 39.4% for NHW. Landmark analysis showed that AAPI had longer median OS 60.6 months (95% CI 20.6–NR), while HIS had shorter median OS 15.4 months (95% CI 8.9–NR; p < 0.01). Among patients who experienced irAEs, median OS for AAPI was 60.6 months (95% CI 20.6–NR), compared to NHW at 48.4 months (95% CI 20.5–NR), AA at 35.7 months (95% CI 2.2–NR), and HIS at 15.2 months (95% CI 6.3–31.0; p = 0.0211). There was no difference in median OS among patients who did not experience irAEs. Multivariate analysis for OS in stage IV patients showed that HIS versus AAPI (hazard ratio: 2.27; 95% CI 1.30–3.95) was a significant variable. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that AAPIs and NHW had higher irAE incidence and longer OS. Validation studies evaluating the role of race/ethnicity in ICI response and toxicity are merited.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hsu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a52e56f1e85e5c73bf1f6ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/17588359261423890
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper