PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 1993Circulation511 citations

A population study of the natural history of Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1953-1989.

View Full Paper
TMThomas M. MungerElectrophysiology
Douglas L. Packer
Douglas L. PackerElectrophysiology
SHStephen C. HammillElectrophysiology

Structured PICO

P
Population
Community-based population with Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome
O
Outcome
Incidence of sudden deathhard clinical

The low incidence of sudden death in asymptomatic WPW patients suggests routine electrophysiological testing is unnecessary, though young patients should be monitored for symptom development.

Abstract

Background: Virtually all natural history studies of Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome have been case series and, as such, have been constrained by referral biases, skewed age and sex distributions, or brief follow-up periods. The purpose of our study was to examine the natural history, the development of arrhythmias, and the incidence of sudden death in an entire cohort of pediatric and adult WPW patients from a community-based local population. Methods and Results: We identified 113 residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, during the period 1953-1989 using the centralized records-linkage system provided by the Mayo Clinic and the Rochester Epidemiology Program Project. Medical records and ECGs were reviewed to confirm the diagnosis and to establish pathway location by ECG criteria. Follow-up, via record review and telephone interview, was complete in 95% of subjects through 1990. The incidence of newly diagnosed cases was approximately four per 100,000 per year. Preexcitation was not present on the initial ECG of 22% of the cohort. Approximately 50% of the population was asymptomatic at diagnosis, with 30% subsequently having symptoms related to arrhythmia at follow-up. Two sudden cardiac deaths (SCD) occurred over 1,338 patient-years of follow-up, yielding an overall SCD rate of 0.0015 (95% confidence interval, 0.0002-0.0054) per patient-year. No SCD occurred in patients asymptomatic at diagnosis. Conclusions: The incidence of sudden death in a local community-based population is low and suggests that electrophysiological testing should not be performed routinely in asymptomatic patients with WPW syndrome. Nevertheless, young, asymptomatic patients, particularly those < 40 years old, should return for medical follow-up should symptoms develop.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Munger et al. (1993) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a5b5e86971bccf1268c8e1https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.87.3.866
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Electrophysiological characteristics of asymptomatic Wolff--Parkinson--White syndrome1993 · 60 citations
  2. 2Longitudinal Electrophysiologic Assessment of Asymptomatic Patients with the Wolff–Parkinson–White Electrocardiographs Pattern1989 · 158 citations
  3. 3The Use of Trans-Esophageal Electrophysiology Study to Identify a High Risk Asymptomatic Wolff Parkinson White Syndrome Patient2014
  4. 4Epidemiology, clinical characteristics and life-threatening risk profile of WPW in children: 30 years population follow up at a single centre in South Wales2024
  5. 5Clinical and electrophysiological evaluation of pediatric Wolff-Parkinson-White patients2014 · 12 citations