PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 13, 2026Brain Circulation0 citationsOpen Access

Reframing the “mild” in mild traumatic brain injury: A comprehensive narrative review of diagnosis and treatment paradigms

View Full Paper
SSShibu SASIDHARANFMFrançois MathieuNPNidhi Patil

Key Points

  • The review aims to evaluate contemporary diagnostic and treatment approaches for mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI).
  • Conducted a literature search across PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science from January 2018 to January 2025.
  • Included 183 studies: 42 systematic reviews, 58 randomized controlled trials, and 83 observational studies.
  • Analyzed advances in biomarker research and neuroimaging techniques, with a focus on treatment strategies.
  • Identified promising early intervention strategies and cognitive rehabilitation approaches.
  • Highlighted challenges in standardizing diagnostic definitions and treatment protocols.
  • Noted the need for large-scale trials to address methodological limitations and improve care access for vulnerable populations.

Abstract

Abstract: Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) constitutes a pervasive yet often overlooked public health challenge with far-reaching implications for individual well-being and healthcare systems globally. This review synthesizes contemporary evidence on diagnosis, management, and emerging treatment paradigms for mTBI using a structured, comprehensive literature search strategy. Through comprehensive literature analysis spanning multiple databases—PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science—from January 2018 to January 2025. A total of 183 studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 42 systematic reviews and meta-analyses, 58 randomized controlled trials, and 83 observational studies. We have identified transformative advances in biomarker research, neuroimaging techniques, and targeted interventions while uncovering persistent challenges in standardizing diagnostic and treatment protocols. Recent randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses reveal promising outcomes for early intervention strategies, cognitive rehabilitation approaches, and novel pharmacological treatments. However, methodological limitations—including heterogeneous mTBI definitions, inconsistent outcome measures, and insufficient long-term follow-up—underscore the need for large-scale trials using standardized definitions and common data elements. Future research must prioritize personalized treatment approaches, integration of cutting-edge technology in assessment and monitoring, and addressing the troubling disparities in access to specialized care for mTBI patients—particularly among vulnerable populations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

SASIDHARAN et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b3ab4c02a1e69014ccc102https://doi.org/10.4103/bc.bc_52_25
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper