PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 5, 2026New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development0 citations

The Story Inside the System: Applying Autoethnography in Adult Education and Human Resource Development

View Full Paper
AMAdam L. McClainCMCraig M. McGillDHDebaro Huyler

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore the role of autoethnography as a research methodology and pedagogical tool in adult education and human resource development.
  • Analyzed the integration of autobiographical and ethnographic approaches
  • Traced the emergence and evolution of autoethnography as a qualitative research method
  • Explored ethical considerations in research and instructional settings
  • Autoethnography bridges personal experiences with broader cultural and institutional contexts.
  • It promotes critical learning and reflects on barriers and inequities in the workplace.
  • The method contributes to curriculum development and supports advocacy for systemic change.

Abstract

This paper examines autoethnography as a research methodology, pedagogical practice, and tool for professional reflection within adult education and human resource development. Autoethnography allows practitioners to critically examine work and life experiences by integrating autobiographical narrative with ethnographic inquiry, situating personal experience within broader cultural, historical, and institutional contexts. Drawing on scholarship from both fields, the paper traces the emergence of autoethnography alongside shifts in qualitative research that challenged positivist assumptions and emphasized reflexivity, subjectivity, and ethical responsibility. Within adult education, autoethnography aligns with long standing traditions of experiential learning, critical pedagogy, and life history approaches that treat learners’ stories as sites of knowledge production. Within human resource development, it offers a means of examining workplace learning, professional identity, organizational culture, and power relations that are often overlooked by rational technical approaches. The paper explores how autoethnography is used to support critical learning, surface barriers and inequities, deepen understanding of learners and practitioners, inform curriculum and organizational practice, and contribute to advocacy and institutional change. Ethical considerations are examined, including vulnerability, consent, relational responsibility, and power dynamics in research and instructional contexts. Together, these perspectives position autoethnography as a method that connects lived experience to broader educational and organizational concerns while foregrounding the responsibilities that accompany writing from the self.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

McClain et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1fdb0a79560c99a0a3d4fhttps://doi.org/10.1177/19394225261432707
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Artistic Autoethnography in Human Resource Development: Deepening Empathy and Affective Understanding to Forward Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Social Justice in the Workplace2024 · 3 citations
  2. 2A pathway to self-awareness, empathy and vulnerability: exploring autoethnography as a method for undergraduate teaching2024 · 4 citations
  3. 3Autoethnography: Critical Appreciation of an Emerging Art2004 · 405 citations
  4. 4“Autoethnography Lets Us Explore What Other Methods Can’t”: An Interview With Dr. Tony Adams2026
  5. 5Assessing from within : the case for autoethnography in higher education assessment and evaluation research2026