PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 7, 20260 citationsOpen Access

A Sieve Engine for Theory Spaces: Proof-Carrying Classification and Residual Certification Paper 34 of the NEMS Suite

View Full Paper
NSNova Spivack

Key Points

  • The paper aims to present a sieve engine that structures theory spaces through constraints and residuals, enabling proof-carrying enumeration.
  • Defined a candidate space with equivalence and optional canonicalization.
  • Established constraints as predicates on candidates.
  • Developed a sieve as the conjunction of constraints and identified a residual as candidates meeting the sieve criteria.
  • Implemented the sieve engine in Lean 4, creating the Sieve library within nems-lean.
  • Proven that adding constraints reduces the residual (indicates monotonicity).
  • Demonstrated support for proof-carrying enumeration that integrates external generators for outputs.
  • Illustrated the functionality with small rewriting systems as a toy domain.

Abstract

Papers 26–33 completed the abstract-core spine of the NEMS Suite: self-reference (26), closure audits (27), reflection as a resource (28), selector-strength barriers (29), self-trust incompleteness (30), epistemic agency and social verification (31), self-improvement under diagonal constraints (32), and self-awareness as a resource (33). The present paper adds a meta-methodology kernel: a generic sieve engine for theory spaces. We define a candidate space with equivalence and optional canonicalization, constraints as predicates on candidates, a sieve as the conjunction of constraints, and a residual as the subtype of candidates satisfying the sieve. We prove that adding constraints shrinks the residual (monotonicity) and that the framework supports proof-carrying enumeration: an external generator can output candidates plus certificates that Lean verifies. The development is mechanized in Lean 4 as the Sieve library in nems-lean, with zero sorry and no custom axioms. A toy domain (small rewriting systems) illustrates the engine. Trust boundary. The sieve engine is reusable methodology: constraints and residuals are user-supplied predicates; toy domains illustrate the API, not physical uniqueness claims. Mechanization is nems-lean . See .

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nova Spivack (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d49f6bb33cc4c35a227e31https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19429783
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Rigidity of the Gauge Signature under PSC: A Sieve Theorem and Residual Classification Program Paper 20 (T3) of the NEMS Suite2026
  2. 2The Theorem of Existential Rigidity (The Collapse of Contingency) Paper 21 (T4) of the NEMS Suite2026
  3. 3Epistemic Agency Under Diagonal Constraints: Society as a Verification Protocol, Strict Separations, and the Necessity of Role Diversity Paper 31 of the NEMS Suite2026
  4. 4Epistemic Agency Under Diagonal Constraints: Society as a Verification Protocol, Strict Separations, and the Necessity of Role Diversity Paper 31 of the NEMS Suite2026
  5. 5Determinacy Without Outsourcing Meta-Principles of Closure, Admissibility, and Internal Burden in the NEMS Program2026