PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2016Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance981 citationsOpen Access

Cardiac T1 Mapping and Extracellular Volume (ECV) in clinical practice: a comprehensive review

PHPhilip HaafPGPankaj GargDMDaniel Messroghli

Structured PICO

Does cardiac T1 mapping and ECV assessment improve the detection of diffuse myocardial fibrosis compared to LGE in patients with cardiomyopathies?

P
Population
Patients with ischaemic and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathies and acute chest pain syndromes
I
Intervention
Cardiac T1 mapping and Extracellular Volume (ECV) assessment
C
Comparator
Late Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE)
O
Outcome
Detection and quantification of focal and diffuse alterations in myocardial structuresurrogate

Cardiac T1 mapping and ECV assessment provide valuable non-invasive tissue characterization for detecting diffuse myocardial fibrosis that may be missed by standard LGE imaging.

Abstract

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance is increasingly used to differentiate the aetiology of cardiomyopathies. Late Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE) is the reference standard for non-invasive imaging of myocardial scar and focal fibrosis and is valuable in the differential diagnosis of ischaemic versus non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Diffuse fibrosis may go undetected on LGE imaging. Tissue characterisation with parametric mapping methods has the potential to detect and quantify both focal and diffuse alterations in myocardial structure not assessable by LGE. Native and post-contrast T1 mapping in particular has shown promise as a novel biomarker to support diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic decision making in ischaemic and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathies as well as in patients with acute chest pain syndromes. Furthermore, changes in the myocardium over time may be assessed longitudinally with this non-invasive tissue characterisation method.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Haaf et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d576f062196bac97d9bd34https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-016-0308-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Extracellular volume imaging by magnetic resonance imaging provides insights into overt and sub-clinical myocardial pathology2012 · 587 citations
  2. 2T1 mapping in ischaemic heart disease2014 · 68 citations
  3. 3T1 Mapping for the Diagnosis of Acute Myocarditis Using CMR2013 · 385 citations
  4. 4Prognostic significance of infarct core pathology revealed by quantitative non-contrast in comparison with contrast cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in reperfused ST-elevation myocardial infarction survivors2015 · 128 citations
  5. 5Normal values for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adults and children2015 · 777 citations