PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 1, 2004Sociological Methods & Research11,779 citations

Multimodel Inference

View Full Paper
KBKenneth P. BurnhamUtah State UniversityDADavid R. AndersonYork University

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The model selection literature has been generally poor at reflecting the deep foundations of the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and at making appropriate comparisons to the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). There is a clear philosophy, a sound criterion based in information theory, and a rigorous statistical foundation for AIC. AIC can be justified as Bayesian using a “savvy” prior on models that is a function of sample size and the number of model parameters. Furthermore, BIC can be derived as a non-Bayesian result. Therefore, arguments about using AIC versus BIC for model selection cannot be from a Bayes versus frequentist perspective. The philosophical context of what is assumed about reality, approximating models, and the intent of model-based inference should determine whether AIC or BIC is used. Various facets of such multimodel inference are presented here, particularly methods of model averaging.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Burnham et al. (2004) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d77532db9d5e1bf4b8ab4bhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0049124104268644
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper