PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 20202,325 citations

Bridging the Gap Between Anchor-Based and Anchor-Free Detection via Adaptive Training Sample Selection

View Full Paper
SZShifeng ZhangCCCheng ChiYYYongqiang Yao

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Object detection has been dominated by anchor-based detectors for several years. Recently, anchor-free detectors have become popular due to the proposal of FPN and Focal Loss. In this paper, we first point out that the essential difference between anchor-based and anchor-free detection is actually how to define positive and negative training samples, which leads to the performance gap between them. If they adopt the same definition of positive and negative samples during training, there is no obvious difference in the final performance, no matter regressing from a box or a point. This shows that how to select positive and negative training samples is important for current object detectors. Then, we propose an Adaptive Training Sample Selection (ATSS) to automatically select positive and negative samples according to statistical characteristics of object. It significantly improves the performance of anchor-based and anchor-free detectors and bridges the gap between them. Finally, we discuss the necessity of tiling multiple anchors per location on the image to detect objects. Extensive experiments conducted on MS COCO support our aforementioned analysis and conclusions. With the newly introduced ATSS, we improve state-of-the-art detectors by a large margin to 50.7% AP without introducing any overhead. The code is available at https://github.com/sfzhang15/ATSS.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2020) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8610de9c100a435ae2a09https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00978
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Scale-Aware Trident Networks for Object Detection2019 · 1,084 citations
  2. 2ScratchDet: Exploring to Train Single-Shot Object Detectors from Scratch.2018 · 24 citations
  3. 3CornerNet-Lite: Efficient Keypoint Based Object Detection2019 · 164 citations
  4. 4Towards Accurate One-Stage Object Detection With AP-Loss2019 · 136 citations
  5. 5Parallel Feature Pyramid Network for Object Detection2018 · 317 citations