PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 25, 2023SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología276 citationsOpen Access

Recent advances in targeted therapies in acute myeloid leukemia

RBRahul S. BhansaliKPKeith W. PratzCLCatherine Lai

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common acute leukemia in adults. While survival for younger patients over the last several decades has improved nearly sixfold with the optimization of intensive induction chemotherapy and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT), this effect has been largely mitigated in older and less fit patients as well as those with adverse-risk disease characteristics. However, the last 10 years has been marked by major advances in the molecular profiling of AML characterized by a deeper understanding of disease pathobiology and therapeutic vulnerabilities. In this regard, the classification of AML subtypes has recently evolved from a morphologic to a molecular and genetic basis, reflected by recent updates from the World Health Organization and the new International Consensus Classification system. After years of stagnation in new drug approvals for AML, there has been a rapid expansion of the armamentarium against this disease since 2017. Low-intensity induction therapy with hypomethylating agents and venetoclax has substantially improved outcomes, including in those previously considered to have a poor prognosis. Furthermore, targeted oral therapies against driver mutations in AML have been added to the repertoire. But with an accelerated increase in treatment options, several questions arise such as how to best sequence therapy, how to combine therapies, and if there is a role for maintenance therapy in those who achieve remission and cannot undergo alloHSCT. Moreover, certain subtypes of AML, such as those with TP53 mutations, still have dismal outcomes despite these recent advances, underscoring an ongoing unmet need and opportunity for translational advances. In this review, we will discuss recent updates in the classification and risk stratification of AML, explore the literature regarding low-intensity and novel oral combination therapies, and briefly highlight investigative agents currently in early clinical development for high-risk disease subtypes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bhansali et al. (2023) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8b517a5ecc596b5d1840dhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-023-01424-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Safety and Activity of Flotetuzumab in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Results from the COG PEPN1812 Phase 1 Trial2022 · 15 citations
  2. 2Tolerability and efficacy of the first-in-class anti-CD47 antibody magrolimab combined with azacitidine in MDS and AML patients: Phase Ib results.2020 · 82 citations
  3. 3A Phase 1 Study of Gilteritinib in Combination with Induction and Consolidation Chemotherapy in Patients with Newly Diagnosed AML: Final Results2020 · 28 citations
  4. 4Genomic Classification in Acute Myeloid Leukemia2016 · 170 citations
  5. 5A review of FDA-approved acute myeloid leukemia therapies beyond ‘7 + 3’2021 · 40 citations