PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2016Journal of Applied Philosophy409 citationsOpen Access

Epistemic Injustice and Illness

View Full Paper
IKIan James KiddHCHavi Carel

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract This article analyses the phenomenon of epistemic injustice within contemporary healthcare. We begin by detailing the persistent complaints patients make about their testimonial frustration and hermeneutical marginalization, and the negative impact this has on their care. We offer an epistemic analysis of this problem using Miranda Fricker's account of epistemic injustice. We detail two types of epistemic injustice, testimonial and hermeneutical, and identify the negative stereotypes and structural features of modern healthcare practices that generate them. We claim that these stereotypes and structural features render ill persons especially vulnerable to these two types of epistemic injustice. We end by proposing five avenues for further work on epistemic injustice in healthcare.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kidd et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8da682c87b79b92d17e9chttps://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12172
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper