PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 12, 2026Machines0 citationsOpen Access

Online Track Anomaly Detection: Comparison of Different Machine Learning Techniques Through Injection of Synthetic Defects on Experimental Datasets

View Full Paper
GBGiovanni BellacciLCLuca Di CarloMFMarco Fiaschi

Key Points

  • This work aims to compare various machine learning techniques for detecting anomalies in track data using synthetic defects.
  • Comparison of different machine learning algorithms.
  • Use of experimental datasets with added synthetic defects.
  • Analysis of frequency and time-based features of signals.
  • Identified effective machine learning techniques for anomaly detection.
  • Synthetic signals mimic the variability of faulty conditions.
  • Preliminary findings suggest potential improvements in safety and maintenance.

Abstract

The adoption of instrumented wheelsets on diagnostic trains offers the possibility of continuous monitoring of wheel–rail contact forces. The collection of large datasets can be exploited for diagnostic purposes, aiming to localize specific track defects, allowing significant improvements in terms of safety and maintenance costs. Machine learning (ML) techniques can be used to automate anomaly detection. In this work, the authors compare the application of various ML algorithms based on the identification of different frequency or time-based features of analyzed signals. To perform the activity, a significant number and variety of local defects have been included in the recorded data. From a practical point of view, the insertion of real known defects into an existing line is extremely time-consuming, expensive, and not immune to safety issues. On the other hand, the design of anomaly detection algorithms involves the usage of relatively extended datasets with different faulty conditions. The authors propose deliberately adding real contact force profiles of healthy lines to a mix of synthetic signals, which substantially reproduce the behavior and the variability of foreseen faulty conditions. The results of this work, although preliminary and still to be completed, offer a contribution to the scientific community both in terms of obtained results and adopted methodologies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bellacci et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69db37b04fe01fead37c5b42https://doi.org/10.3390/machines14040424
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper