PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 18, 1995BMJ1,901 citationsOpen Access

The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect

View Full Paper
RCRichard J. CookUniversity of Arkansas at Little RockDSD L SackettSt. Joseph Hospital

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The relative benefit of an active treatment over a control is usually expressed as the relative risk, the relative risk reduction, or the odds ratio. These measures are used extensively in both clinical and epidemiological investigations. For clinical decision making, however, it is more meaningful to use the measure "number needed to treat." This measure is calculated on the inverse of the absolute risk reduction. It has the advantage that it conveys both statistical and clinical significance to the doctor. Furthermore, it can be used to extrapolate published findings to a patient at an arbitrary specified baseline risk when the relative risk reduction associated with treatment is constant for all levels of risk.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cook et al. (1995) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dbebecc34c3c3eb46841e9https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.310.6977.452
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper