PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 13, 2026Respiratory Care11 citations

Effect of Inspiratory Flowrate and Circuit Compressible Volume on Auto-PEEP during Mechanical Ventilation

View Full Paper
LSLeta Rose ScottMBMichael S. BensonDPDavid J Pierson

Key Points

  • This research aims to determine how inspiratory flowrate and circuit compressibility impact levels of auto-PEEP during mechanical ventilation.
  • Constructed a laboratory model with a ventilator and endotracheal tube to measure auto-PEEP.
  • Applied various inspiratory flow rates and circuit types while keeping tidal volume and frequency constant.
  • Conducted clinical tests on adult patients with auto-PEEP to validate bench findings.
  • Increasing flow from 60 to 100 L/min in bench studies reduced auto-PEEP from 20 cm H2O to 7.5 cm H2O.
  • Using low compressible volume (LCV) circuits led to lower auto-PEEP values at various flow rates.
  • Clinical studies showed significant reduction in auto-PEEP, with mean values decreasing from 15.8 cm H2O to 9.0 cm H2O when increasing flowrates.

Abstract

The term "auto-PEEP" has been applied to PEEP that occurs during mechanical ventilation when there has been incomplete exhalation of a delivered breath at the onset of the next inspiration. We hypothesized that shortening inspiratory time by increasing flowrate and/or using a circuit with low compressible volume (LCV) would decrease auto-PEEP. Methods: We first constructed a laboratory model to test our hypothesis under controlled conditions. Using a Manley test lung connected to an MA-1 ventilator, we created auto-PEEP by applying a screw clamp to the endotracheal tube and quantitated auto-PEEP by use of calibrated transducers on either side of the obstruction. To confirm the bench studies clinically, we randomly varied inspiratory flow and circuitry-keeping corrected tidal volume (V T ) and frequency (f) constant- in five adult patients with auto-PEEP. Results: In the bench studies, when auto-PEEP was 20 cm H 2 O with standard ventilator circuitry (corrected VT = 550 ml and f = 24/min), increasing inspiratory flow from 60 to 100 L/min reduced auto-PEEP to 7.5 cm H 2 O. Switching to LCV circuitry at the same V T and f produced auto-PEEP of 10 cm H 2 O at 60 L/min flow and 5 cm H 2 O at 100 L/min. In the clinical studies of adult patients, at flowrates of 60 and 100 L/min, mean auto-PEEP values were 15.8 and 9.0 cm H 2 O, respectively, with standard tubing; with LCV tubing the respective auto-PEEP values were 12.6 and 5.8 cm H 2 O. (P < 0.05 in both clinical studies.) We conclude that higher inspiratory flowrates and a low compressible volume circuit are effective in reducing auto-PEEP in mechanically ventilated adults. (Respir Care 1986;31:1075-1079.)

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Scott et al. (1986) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dc874a3afacbeac03e9ae1https://doi.org/10.1177/194336548603101107
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Complications of Mechanical Ventilation and Positive End-Expiratory Pressure1982 · 6 citations
  2. 2The Clinical Application of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) in the Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)1985 · 11 citations
  3. 3PHYSIOLOGICAL STUDIES OF THE EFFECTS OF INTERMITTENT POSITIVE PRESSURE BREATHING ON CARDIAC OUTPUT IN MAN1947 · 732 citations
  4. 4Thoracic pressure-volume curves in respiratory failure1976 · 10 citations
  5. 5Effect of Tidal Volume and Positive End-Expiratory Pressure on Compliance during Mechanical Ventilation1978 · 277 citations