PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 16, 2026Environmental Pollution0 citationsOpen Access

Spatial Occurrence and Distribution of Micropollutants (Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products) in the eThekwini Catchment, South Africa

View Full Paper
TLTolulope I. LawrenceNSNatalie SimsBKBarbara Kasprzyk-Hordern

Key Points

  • This research aims to characterize the occurrence and distribution of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the eThekwini catchment area.
  • Monitored 42 pharmaceuticals and personal care products over a week
  • Compared four wastewater treatment plants with different treatment technologies
  • Analyzed influent and effluent concentrations of detected compounds
  • Conducted ecotoxicological risk assessments of PPCP mixtures.
  • Activated sludge treatment showed higher removal efficiencies for PPCPs than non-biological treatments.
  • 1,7-dimethylxanthine had the highest concentrations in both influent and effluent.
  • PPCP levels increased downstream, linked to WWTP effluent contributions.
  • Some weekday-weekend variations in PPCP concentrations indicated differing consumption habits.
  • Most effluent PPCPs posed insignificant to medium aquatic risk according to ecological assessments.

Abstract

This study presents, for the first time, the spatial and short-term temporal occurrence of forty-two multiclass pharmaceuticals, their metabolites, and personal care products in wastewater across a catchment area with and without rivers connected to wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in the eThekwini Metropolitan Municipality of South Africa. Four major WWTPs were studied, each with different wastewater treatment technologies and their receiving water bodies, over a week. This study compared the efficiency of the treatment plants and found that the removal efficiency depends on the treatment process employed. Wastewater treatment plants that employed activated sludge consistently achieve higher removal efficiencies for pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) than plants that rely solely on screening and sedimentation. Most detected PPCPs increased downstream, indicating contributions from WWTP effluent; however, for some compounds, lower concentrations in the effluent relative to upstream concentrations led to dilution after mixing, demonstrating the combined influence of effluent inputs and hydrological mixing on river water quality. There is also concern about synergistic effects from the combination of these PPCPs, which may be detrimental despite their presence at trace levels. Among the PPCPs monitored, 26 were detected in the influent and effluent, with the most detected PPCPs in both being benzophenone-3, metformin, gliclazide, atenolol, carbamazepine, carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide, 10,11-dihydro-10-hydroxycarbamazepine, nicotine, caffeine, 1,7-dimethylxanthine, N-desmethyltramadol, and O-desmethyltramadol. The weekday-weekend concentrations of some PPCPs (citalopram, 1,7-dimethylxanthine, nicotine, metformin, atenolol, cimetidine, benzophenone-3, gliclazide, quetiapine, and 10,11-dihydro-10-hydroxycarbamazepine) were significantly different across the various plants, indicating variation in the consumption habits of the people these plants serve. The highest concentrations in the influents and effluents were observed for 1,7-dimethylxanthine (a metabolite of caffeine), with mean concentrations of 723 668.4 ± 180 002.5 ng L -1 and 409 405.7 ± 173 761.3 ng L -1 , respectively. Except for acetaminophen, desvenlafaxine, carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide, nicotine, caffeine, and 1,7-dimethylxanthine in one or two treatment plants, the majority of the PPCPs in the effluent showed an insignificant to medium aquatic risk (this level of risk is similar for the studied surface water), based on an ecotoxicological risk assessment. Given that these PPCPs are present as complex mixtures with diverse physicochemical properties and varying capacities to influence a range of molecular and cellular processes in organisms, a better understanding of their ecological risk is needed to promote environmental health. • 42 PPCPs were monitored in the eThekwini catchment over a week at four WWTPs. • The CAS process showed better PPCP removal than non-biological treatments. • In both influent and effluent, 1,7-dimethylxanthine was most prevalent. • Increases in river PPCPs point to sources connected to lifestyle and WWTP discharge. • Ecotoxicological risk from PPCP mixtures needs more research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lawrence et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e07c632f7e8953b7cbdb45https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2026.128139
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper