PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 16, 2026Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Superficial Quadriceps Versus Hamstring Tendon Grafts for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A 2-Center Comparative Study

View Full Paper
BABurak Menderes AkdoğanFBFatih BarçaŞGŞahan Güven

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare outcomes and complications between superficial quadriceps and hamstring tendon grafts used in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.
  • Conducted a retrospective, 2-center cohort study
  • Included 47 patients (49 knees) undergoing MPFL reconstruction
  • Compared superficial quadriceps tendon graft and hamstring tendon graft fixed with suture anchors
  • Recorded preoperative radiographic parameters and patient-reported outcomes (Kujala, Lysholm, Tegner, VAS for pain)
  • Primary outcome was the Kujala score at final follow-up, with secondary outcomes including complications.
  • No significant differences in Kujala, Lysholm, Tegner scores, or VAS pain scores between groups (P > .05)
  • Overall complication rates were similar: 21.7% in the QT group vs 15.4% in the HT group
  • Complications included redislocation, positive apprehension, flexion limitation, and one patellar fracture in the HT group
  • Patients with complications showed lower clinical scores regardless of graft type
  • No patellar fractures occurred in the QT group.

Abstract

Background: Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is an established treatment for recurrent patellar instability. Techniques requiring patellar drilling (tunnels or sockets for fixation) may increase the risk of iatrogenic patellar fracture. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to compare clinical outcomes and complications after MPFL reconstruction using a superficial quadriceps tendon (QT) graft versus a hamstring tendon (HT) graft) fixed with patellar all-suture anchors. It was hypothesized that the superficial QT technique would yield patient-reported outcomes comparable with the HT technique, with a different profile of patella-related complications. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective, 2-center review identified 47 patients (49 knees) who underwent MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patellar instability. A total of 23 knees were reconstructed with a patellar tunnel–free superficial QT graft and 26 with an HT graft fixed to the patella using suture anchors and to the femur at the Schöttle point. Patients with prior patellar surgery, periarticular fractures, or insufficient follow-up were excluded. Preoperative radiographic parameters and patient-reported outcomes (Kujala, Lysholm, Tegner, and visual analog scale VAS for pain) were recorded. The primary outcome was the Kujala score at final follow-up; secondary outcomes included other scores and complications (recurrent instability, patellar fracture, positive apprehension, and range-of-motion limitation). Results: Groups were comparable in demographics and radiographic measures at baseline. The mean follow-up duration was 59.8 months in the QT group and 50.7 months in the HT group. No significant between-group differences were observed in Kujala, Lysholm, Tegner, or VAS pain scores (all P > .05). Overall complication rates were similar (21.7% vs 15.4%). Complications included redislocation, positive apprehension, flexion limitation, and 1 patellar fracture in the HT group. Patients who developed postoperative complications had lower clinical scores, irrespective of graft type. Conclusion: Superficial quadriceps and HT autografts provide similarly favorable clinical outcomes and complication rates in MPFL reconstruction. No patellar fractures occurred in the QT group; however, fracture rates were not statistically different between groups and the study was underpowered for rare events. The QT technique avoids patellar drilling and may be considered in patients perceived to be at higher risk for patellar fracture.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Akdoğan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e07d732f7e8953b7cbe706https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671261425632
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper