PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 16, 2026Physics of Fluids0 citations

Incorporating wall quantities in variable fidelity modeling for aerodynamic shape optimization

View Full Paper
CWChaoliang WengYYYuxin YangYXYoutao Xue

Key Points

  • The aim is to enhance aerodynamic shape optimization by integrating wall-quantity information into variable fidelity modeling.
  • Developed a ConvNeXt-based wall-quantity prediction model using transfer learning.
  • Implemented an improved Gaussian process regression algorithm with automatic kernel construction.
  • Validated the method using low-fidelity and high-fidelity data samples.
  • Achieved approximate optimal reference values with only 24 low-fidelity and 10 high-fidelity samples.
  • Reduced computational cost by 28.57% compared to high-fidelity-only approaches.
  • Maintained high accuracy in aerodynamic optimization under small-sample conditions.

Abstract

With the growing demand for hypersonic vehicle design, efficient aerodynamic optimization is increasingly important. Surrogate-based optimization offers a promising means for low-cost and rapid design, yet its accuracy is often sensitive to sample size, and the high computational cost of generating sufficient high-fidelity data limits practical efficiency. Although wall-quantity-based models can reduce reliance on training samples, they frequently suffer from low predictive accuracy under small-sample conditions and lack effective synergy with aerodynamic coefficient models, restricting their predictive capability. To address these challenges, this study proposes a variable-fidelity modeling method that integrates wall-quantity information. The framework combines a ConvNeXt-based wall-quantity prediction model with transfer learning to provide low-fidelity data, together with an improved Gaussian process regression algorithm incorporating automatic kernel construction to capture correlations across fidelity levels. Validation results demonstrate that the proposed method approximates optimal reference values using only 24 low-fidelity and ten high-fidelity samples, with a computational cost of 355.56 central processing unit (CPU) core-hours. Compared with a conventional high-fidelity-only approach requiring 20 samples and 497.78 CPU core-hours, the proposed method reduces computational cost by 28.57% while maintaining accuracy. These findings highlight its effectiveness in achieving efficient and high-precision aerodynamic optimization under small-sample conditions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Weng et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e07de52f7e8953b7cbedb7https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0323719
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper