PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 17, 2026Acta veterinaria Scandinavica0 citationsOpen Access

Seasonal variation in prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and Neoehrlichia mikurensis in Ixodes ricinus nymphs in southern Norway

ACAndrea Cotes-PerdomoASArnulf SolengKMKenedith Méndez-Gutierrez

Key Points

  • Evaluate the seasonal prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi and Neoehrlichia mikurensis in Ixodes ricinus nymphs in southern Norway.
  • Conducted field study in a single location in southern Norway.
  • Assessed prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi and Neoehrlichia mikurensis in tick samples.
  • Measured density of infected Ixodes ricinus nymphs throughout different months.
  • Overall prevalence of 12% for Borrelia burgdorferi s. l. and 8% for Neoehrlichia mikurensis.
  • Highest prevalence of Borrelia afzelii among B. burgdorferi s. l. genospecies.
  • Peak density of infected nymphs for B. burgdorferi in May; for N. mikurensis in September.
  • Negative correlation found between B. burgdorferi prevalence and tick density.

Abstract

Abstract Background Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (s. l.) and Neoehrlichia mikurensis are the most prevalent pathogenic bacteria found in Ixodes ricinus in Norway. Here we evaluate the prevalence of both bacteria and the density of infected ticks, key factors to assess the human infection risk. The study was performed in one location in southern Norway. Results An overall prevalence of 12% for B. burgdorferi s. l. and 8% for N. mikurensis was found. The most prevalent B. burgdorferi s. l. genospecies was Borrelia afzelii , followed by Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto and Borrelia garinii. The highest density of infected nymphs with B. burgdorferi s. l. was in May and the lowest was in November. In the case of N. mikurensis , the highest density of infected nymphs was found in September and the lowest in November. B. burgdorferi s. l. prevalence was negatively correlated with tick density. Conclusions Our results highlight the importance of assessing not only pathogen prevalences but also tick population densities. Extended periods of surveillance in questing ticks are necessary to understand the intricate dynamics of ticks and tick-borne pathogens.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cotes-Perdomo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e1cfb15cdc762e9d858a23https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-026-00860-x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper