PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 17, 2026Journal of Industrial and Business Economics0 citationsOpen Access

Green transition and decarbonization: the role of CCUS projects

View Full Paper
ABAntonio BarchiMIMarco IllichLRLaura Rondi

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore factors influencing the implementation and distribution of CCUS projects across different countries and industries.
  • Analyzed the IEA’s CCUS projects database from 1990 to 2023.
  • Investigated the concentration of CCUS projects in specific sectors like oil & gas and agrochemicals.
  • Examined the impact of organizational strategies and policy frameworks on project deployment.
  • Surge in CCUS initiatives primarily in oil & gas and agrochemicals.
  • Different policy frameworks in EU and North America lead to variance in project deployment.
  • Current CCUS projects do not meet climate targets for GHG emissions reduction by 2030.

Abstract

Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage (CCUS) technologies are critical for achieving decarbonization and carbon neutrality, yet implementing effective projects remains complex and costly. Using the IEA’s CCUS projects database (1990–2023), we study the factors explaining why certain countries attract more projects, why CCUS projects are more concentrated in specific industries and how organizational choices affect their implementation and scale. We find that the recent surge in CCUS initiatives has occurred particularly in oil & gas, agrochemicals, and materials sectors, and that different policy frameworks in the EU and North America may have lead to different deployment in these regions. Focusing on corporate strategies, we observe that even the largest companies collaborate within project hub, leveraging combined expertise and competences across sectors, and that project deployment and capture capacity vary by organizational structure, location, and scope of the value chain. Finally, a preliminary assessment of the potential to reduce GHG emissions by 2030 shows that the current number and scale of projects fall short of climate targets, highlighting the need for stronger public support and more efficient capture technologies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Barchi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e1cfcb5cdc762e9d858cadhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-025-00382-z
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Does carbon capture & storage mitigate carbon premium? Evidence from patents2026 · 2 citations
  2. 2Combustion vs. gasification for a demonstration CCS (carbon capture and storage) project in Italy: A techno-economic analysis2013 · 62 citations
  3. 3Explaining successful and failed investments in U.S. carbon capture and storage using empirical and expert assessments2020 · 88 citations
  4. 4Carbon capture and storage in the UK and Germany: easier task, stronger commitment?2015 · 26 citations
  5. 5The environmental opportunity cost of using renewable energy for carbon capture and utilization for methanol production2020 · 106 citations