PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026BMC Gastroenterology0 citationsOpen Access

Robotic versus open Frey’s procedure for chronic pancreatitis: a single center’s experience of 40 cases over a 7-year period

WLWei LiYCYali ChengXYXue Yang

Key Points

  • This study aims to compare the outcomes of robotic versus open Frey’s procedures for chronic pancreatitis.
  • Conducted a retrospective analysis of 40 patients who underwent Frey’s procedure from 2016 to 2022.
  • Compared surgical duration, in-hospital stays, complications, and pain relief between robotic and open techniques.
  • Evaluated the role of preoperative extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in stone removal.
  • Robotic surgeries took longer than open surgeries (315 min vs. 238 min, p = 0.004).
  • Patients in the robotic group had shorter median in-hospital stay.
  • Both robotic and open procedures achieved 100% pain relief with no difference in postoperative complications.

Abstract

Abstract Background Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a progressive inflammatory disease characterized by structural damage and chronic pancreatic fibrosis. Frey’s procedure combined both resection and drainage, is a safe and effective procedure for chronic pancreatitis. Methods This study aims to compare the effect of robotic and open Frey’s procedure in our single center. A retrospective study of patients who underwent a Frey’s procedure (robotic and open) due to CP between January 2016 to December 2022 in a hospital in Xi’an Jiaotong University was made. Results In our study, 40 patients met the inclusion criteria, 72.5% of patients were male. The etiology in most cases (47.5%) was idiopathic, and 32.5% of patients were alcoholic. 22.5% patients received extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) before surgery. 21/40 patients underwent robot assisted Frey’s procedure. The duration of surgery was longer in robotic group (315 min vs. 238 min, p = 0.004). The median length of in-hospital stay and postoperative hospital stay were shorter in the robotic group. There was no significant difference in the postoperative complications and short-term outcomes of pancreatic exocrine and endocrine dysfunction between the two groups. The rate of pain relief was 100%. Although no significant difference was observed in the operation time and postoperative complications between the patient who got pre-operative ESWL or not, patients who received ESWL before surgery were most likely to have easily stones removed. Conclusions Robotic Frey’s procedure is safe and feasible for CP patients. Preoperative ESWL treatment may be helpful for intraoperative pancreatic duct stone removal.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e31f7340886becb653ebbahttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-026-04790-w
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper