PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 22, 2026Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care0 citationsOpen Access

Rethinking medical education in India: A review of student-reported outcomes in the preclinical CBME era

View Full Paper
RSRohit SarohaMKMuneeb KosviSSS. P. Singh

Key Points

  • The aim is to synthesize evidence on student perceptions and teaching methods in the CBME framework in India.
  • Conducted a structured narrative review of literature from databases including PubMed and Scopus.
  • Focused on studies from January 2019 to May 2025 regarding undergraduate MBBS CBME.
  • Performed thematic analysis across various domains such as teaching methods and institutional support.
  • Students prefer interactive and integrated learning approaches.
  • Early clinical exposure and AETCOM modules were positively viewed but inconsistently delivered.
  • Key challenges include gaps in faculty training, assessment overload, and differences between government and private colleges.

Abstract

A BSTRACT Background: The introduction of competency-based medical education (CBME) by the National Medical Commission (NMC) in India marked a pivotal transformation in undergraduate medical training. While this framework aims to produce skilled, ethical, and lifelong learners, its implementation, especially during the preclinical years, has presented both opportunities and challenges. Objective: To synthesize current evidence on student perceptions, teaching–learning strategies, early clinical exposure, AETCOM modules, self-directed learning, assessment practices, and institutional variability in CBME implementation across Indian medical colleges. Methods: A structured narrative review was conducted using literature from PubMed, Scopus, ERIC, and Google Scholar. Studies published between January 2019 and May 2025 that focused on undergraduate MBBS CBME in India were included. Thematic analysis was performed across domains, such as teaching–learning methods, student feedback, faculty preparedness, and institutional support. Results: Evidence indicates strong student preference for interactive and integrated learning modalities. Early clinical exposure (ECE) and AETCOM modules were well received but suffered from inconsistencies in delivery. Self-directed learning (SDL) showed variable readiness among the students. Key challenges include faculty training gaps, infrastructural disparities, assessment overload, and heightened student anxiety. Institutional variation, particularly between government and private colleges, impacts curriculum fidelity. Conclusion: While CBME is a promising step toward modernizing Indian medical education, its effectiveness depends on continuous faculty development, contextual curriculum refinement, and integrated student support systems. Harmonizing implementation strategies across institutions is crucial for achieving equitable educational outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Saroha et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e865fd6e0dea528ddea689https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1587_25
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper