PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Diagnostics0 citationsOpen Access

Evaluation of Presacral Vascular Anatomy Using Contrast-Enhanced 3D-CT for Surgical Planning in Endoscopic Sacrocolpopexy

View Full Paper
AAAkiko AbeYKYasushi KotaniCWChiharu Wada

Key Points

  • This study aimed to assess the frequency of clinically significant presacral venous variations during endoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
  • Retrospective cohort study of 265 patients who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced CT for endoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
  • Focused on two key vascular findings related to surgical risk: anomalous internal iliac vein drainage and visible median sacral vein.
  • Statistical analysis using Student’s t-test and chi-squared test to evaluate surgical time, blood loss, and complications.
  • Anomalous drainage of the internal iliac vein was found in 11.3% of patients.
  • Visible median sacral vein was noted in 10.2% of patients.
  • Overall, 17.7% had at least one clinically significant vascular variation with no differences in outcomes.

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic sacrocolpopexy (ESC) is a widely performed procedure for pelvic organ prolapse, with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) and robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy (RSC) approaches. However, suturing to the anterior longitudinal ligament at the sacral promontory carries a risk of massive hemorrhage due to presacral vascular injury. This study aimed to determine the frequency of presacral venous variations considered clinically relevant during suturing at the promontory and to explore their association with perioperative outcomes using contrast-enhanced three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT). Methods: Among 319 consecutive ESC cases performed between 2014 and 2025, 265 patients who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced CT were retrospectively analyzed in this single-center cohort study. Two vascular findings were defined as clinically significant: (1) anomalous drainage of the internal iliac vein into the contralateral common iliac vein and (2) a clearly visualized median sacral vein on 3D reconstruction. The clinical impact of vascular abnormalities was evaluated using surgical time, blood loss, and perioperative complication rates as indicators. Student’s t-test was used for comparing continuous variables, and the chi-squared test was used for comparing categorical variables. The data for this study were retrospectively collected from electronic medical records, anonymized, and then analyzed. Results: Anomalous internal iliac vein drainage was observed in 11.3% (30/265), and a visible median sacral vein was observed in 10.2% (27/265). Overall, 17.7% (47/265, CI: 13.2–22.2%) of patients had at least one clinically significant variation. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age, parity, BMI, operative time, blood loss, or perioperative complication rates. No cases required transfusion. Conclusions: Clinically significant presacral vein mutations were present in approximately 1 in 6 patients. The main findings of this study are that clinically significant presacral vascular mutations are relatively frequent (17.7%) in ESC and that there was no significant difference in perioperative outcomes between patients with and without vascular mutations. Clinically relevant presacral vascular variations are relatively common in ESC. Preoperative contrast-enhanced 3D-CT may support risk assessment and surgical planning.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Abe et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa97ce04f884e66b531abdhttps://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16091385
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper