PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026Children1 citationsOpen Access

Learning Curve Analysis of Laparoscopic Intracorporeal Sac Transection and Purse-String Suture for Pediatric Inguinal Hernia Repair

View Full Paper
HYHee‐Beom Yang

Key Points

  • To assess the learning curve and safety profile of laparoscopic intracorporeal sac transection with purse-string suture (LIST-PS) in pediatric patients.
  • Retrospective analysis of 469 pediatric patients
  • Learning curve assessed using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis of operative times
  • Cohort divided into learning and proficiency phases
  • Comparison of high-risk subgroup (preterm infants) with control group
  • Mean operative time decreased from 70.6 min in phase 1 to 52.0 min in phase 2
  • Recurrence rate stable at 1.7% across phases
  • High-risk subgroup required longer operative times with no significant difference in recurrence compared to control group

Abstract

Background: Although various laparoscopic techniques are available for pediatric hernia repair, the learning curve for laparoscopic intracorporeal sac transection with purse-string suture (LIST-PS) has not yet been established. Considering that intracorporeal suturing is technically more challenging than extracorporeal knotting, an objective assessment of surgical competence is crucial. The study aimed to evaluate the learning curve and safety profile of LIST-PS performed by a single surgeon in a large series of pediatric patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 469 pediatric patients treated between March 2019 and December 2025 was conducted. The learning curve was assessed using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis of operative times. The cohort was divided into phases 1 (learning) and 2 (proficiency) based on the CUSUM peak. Additionally, a high-risk subgroup (preterm infants aged 0.999). In a subgroup analysis, the high-risk group (preterm infants and infants < 1 year) required longer operative times (73.5 ± 32.8 min vs. 57.7 ± 19.2 min; p < 0.001) but showed no significant difference in recurrence compared to the control group (0.96% vs. 1.92%; p = 0.691). Conclusions: Technical proficiency in LIST-PS was achieved after 233 cases. Although high-risk patients consistently required more time, the surgeon’s improvement followed a parallel trajectory across all risk levels, maintaining high surgical safety throughout the learning process.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hee‐Beom Yang (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69faa22704f884e66b532d80https://doi.org/10.3390/children13050628
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Percutaneous Internal Ring Suturing for Inguinal Hernia Repair in Children: Retrospective Cohort of 714 Patients with Minimum 3-Year Follow-Up2024 · 6 citations
  2. 2Etiology of Inguinal Hernias: A Comprehensive Review2017 · 189 citations