PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 2026International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience0 citations

Oculomotor Dysfunctions in Nonreading Tasks in Children With Dyslexia: Saccadic and Optokinetic Findings

View Full Paper
MÜMelikşah Safa ÜçokMDMustafa DinçerCKCeren Karaçaylı

Key Points

  • The research aims to assess oculomotor control differences in children with dyslexia during nonreading tasks.
  • Analyzed peak velocity, accuracy, and latency of saccades.
  • Conducted optokinetic response tests for each eye and calculated interocular differences.
  • Trials with blinks or track-loss were excluded from analysis.
  • Children with dyslexia had slower saccades (307.5°/s compared to 453.5°/s).
  • Accuracy in dyslexia was lower (71.5% vs. 98.5%).
  • Latency was longer in children with dyslexia (260.0 ms vs. 131.5 ms).
  • Significant interocular OKR differences were observed, especially in right-eye responses.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dyslexia has been associated with atypical eye-movement control, but whether such differences arise only during reading or reflect broader oculomotor control remains debated. METHODS: ). Primary outcomes were peak velocity (°/s), accuracy (%) and latency (ms); optokinetic responses (OKR) were analysed for each eye, and we report the interocular OKR difference (%). Trials with blinks/track-loss were excluded a priori. RESULTS: Compared with controls, children with dyslexia showed slower saccades (307.5°/s vs. 453.5°/s), lower accuracy (71.5% vs. 98.5%) and longer latency (260.0 vs. 131.5 ms), all p < 0.001. Right-eye OKR was reduced, whereas left-eye OKR did not differ significantly, and the interocular OKR difference was significantly larger in dyslexia. These group differences remained significant after adjustment for relevant socio-demographic covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Children with dyslexia exhibited robust oculomotor differences during a nonreading task, consistent with altered visually guided saccade control. These results are associative rather than causal and suggest that oculomotor measures may provide complementary insight into dyslexia.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Üçok et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbe3aa164b5133a91a2ee6https://doi.org/10.1002/jdn.70132
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper