PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2014Journal of Experimental Biology37 citationsOpen Access

The evolution of micro-cursoriality in mammals

BLBarry G. LovegroveMMMetoboroghene O. Mowoe

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

In this study we report on the evolution of micro-cursoriality, a unique case of cursoriality in mammals smaller than 1 kg. We obtained new running speed and limb morphology data for two species of elephant-shrews (Elephantulus spp., Macroscelidae) from Namaqualand, South Africa, which we compared with published data for other mammals. Elephantulus maximum running speeds were higher than those of most mammals smaller than 1 kg. Elephantulus also possess exceptionally high metatarsal:femur ratios (1.07) that are typically associated with fast unguligrade cursors. Cursoriality evolved in the Artiodactyla, Perissodactyla and Carnivora coincident with global cooling and the replacement of forests with open landscapes in the Oligocene and Miocene. The majority of mammal species, though, remained non-cursorial, plantigrade and small (<1 kg). The extraordinary running speed and digitigrady of elephant-shrews was established in the Early Eocene in the earliest macroscelid Prodiacodon, but was probably inherited from Paleocene, Holarctic stem macroscelids. Micro-cursoriality in macroscelids evolved from the plesiomorphic plantigrade foot of the possum-like ancestral mammal earlier than in other mammalian crown groups. Micro-cursoriality evolved first in forests, presumably in response to selection for rapid running speeds facilitated by local knowledge, in order to avoid predators. During the Miocene, micro-cursoriality was pre-adaptive to open, arid habitats, and became more derived in the newly evolved Elephantulus and Macroscelides elephant-shrews with trail running.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lovegrove et al. (2014) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ffa264e4618ba4162d8838https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.095737
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Phylogeny and Zoogeography of Six Squirrel Species of the Genus Sciurus (Mammalia, Rodentia), Inferred from Cytochrome b Gene Sequences.2000 · 23 citations
  2. 2Cope's Rule and the Dynamics of Body Mass Evolution in North American Fossil Mammals1998 · 563 citations
  3. 3Postcranial skeleton of Eocene Leptictidae (Mammalia), and its implications for behavior and relationships1999 · 59 citations
  4. 4A new apheliscine "condylarth" mammal from the late Paleocene of Montana and Alberta and the phylogeny of "hyopsodontids"2005 · 26 citations
  5. 5Body Size, Diet, and Population Density of Neotropical Forest Mammals1986 · 356 citations