This paper introduces Principia Cognitia, a comprehensive axiomatic framework that formalizes and extends the MLC/ELM (Metalanguage of Cognition/External Language of Meaning) duality currently under review in Cognitive Science. Building on empirical foundations established in companion work, we present a unified mathematical framework for cognitive processes across biological and artificial systems. The theory centers on a cognitive triad ⟨S, 𝒪, Rᵣel⟩ comprising semions (discrete meaning-bearing states), operations (physically realizable transformations), and relations (emergent structural constraints). We provide substrate-invariant formalization of cognitive operations, thermodynamically grounded processing constraints following Landauer's principle, and operationalizable metrics for temporal synchronization and prediction error minimization. Key contributions include: (1) formal axioms grounding cognition in physical reality while maintaining substrate independence; (2) theorems on temporal synchronization, narrative thresholds, and dual language regulation; (3) the "KilburnGPT" gedankenexperiment demonstrating computational invariance across radically different substrates; and (4) three falsifiable experimental protocols (MPE-1, SIT-1, VGE-1) for empirical validation. This framework bridges symbolic and connectionist approaches, offering a mathematical foundation for cross-disciplinary cognitive research with immediate applications to AI alignment, human-machine collaboration, and the formal analysis of transformer architectures. The work establishes cognition as a precise object of formal inquiry, comparable to how mathematics formalized number or physics formalized motion.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Алексей Снигиров
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Алексей Снигиров (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68af5707ad7bf08b1eaddae9 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.24108/preprints-3113683
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: