This study explores the challenges and theoretical transformations that the widespread application of AI technology in social governance brings to the protection of citizens’ fundamental rights. By examining typical cases in judicial assistance, technology-enabled law enforcement, and welfare supervision, it explains how AI characteristics such as algorithmic opacity, data bias, and automated decision-making affect fundamental rights including due process, equal protection, and privacy. The article traces the historical evolution of privacy theory from physical space protection to informational self-determination and further to modern data rights, pointing out the inadequacy of traditional rights-protection paradigms in addressing the characteristics of AI technology. Through analyzing AI-governance models in the European Union, the United States, Northeast Asia, and international organizations, it demonstrates diverse governance approaches ranging from systematic risk regulation to decentralized industry regulation. With a special focus on China, the article analyzes the special challenges faced in AI governance and proposes specific recommendations for improving AI-governance paths. The article argues that only within the track of the rule of law, through continuous theoretical innovation, institutional construction, and international cooperation, can AI technology development be ensured to serve human dignity, freedom, and fair justice.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jinghui He
Zhenyang Zhang
Laws
Dongguk University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
He et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1b34654b1d3bfb60e9861 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14040054
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: