This year-long quasi-experimental study examined whether sub-second, generative-AI feedback loops can engineer durable improvements in learners emotion-regulation capacity and, by extension, accelerate spoken foreign-language development. Two hundred and fourteen Grade-9 Chinese EFL learners (107 experimental, 107 control) completed 128 teaching hours over thirty-two weeks. In the experimental arm, ChatGPT-4o streamed affect-sensitive feedback to individual tablets with a median detection-to-response latency of 0.68 s, whereas control classes received conventional end-of-task comments. Forty-one multimodal cues, eye-fixation entropy, galvanic-skin-response peaks, voice-stress jitter, lexical surprisal, disfluency density and more, were synchronised at 30 Hz on an IEEE-1588 backbone and fused by a dynamic Bayesian network into a continuous Emotion Regulation Index (ERI). AI-triggered micro-interventions occurred 14 410 times (mean duration = 9.3 s) and were logged for lag analysis. Latent growth-curve modelling showed a robust positive ERI slope in the AI cohort ( = 0.083 0.011, p < 0.001) and a marginal decline among controls ( = 0.019 0.014, p = 0.071). Year-end Cambridge B1 speaking scores rose 1.34 SD for AI learners versus 0.57 SD for controls (t = 9.27, df = 212, p < 0.0001). Results indicate that finely tuned generative-AI feedback stabilises classroom affect, shortens self-regulation latency, and delivers substantial proficiency dividends.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yurong Zhao
Hua Yixin
Applied and Computational Engineering
The University of Melbourne
Education University of Hong Kong
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zhao et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1bb5b54b1d3bfb60ecd0e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.54254/2755-2721/2025.25568
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: