Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Multi-modal large language models(MLLMs) have achieved remarkable progress and demonstrated powerful knowledge comprehension and reasoning abilities. However, the mastery of domain-specific knowledge, which is essential for evaluating the intelligence of MLLMs, continues to be a challenge. Current multi-modal benchmarks for domain-specific knowledge concentrate on multiple-choice questions and are predominantly available in English, which imposes limitations on the comprehensiveness of the evaluation. To this end, we introduce CMMU, a novel benchmark for multi-modal and multi-type question understanding and reasoning in Chinese. CMMU consists of 3,603 questions in 7 subjects, covering knowledge from primary to high school. The questions can be categorized into 3 types: multiple-choice, multiple-response, and fill-in-the-blank, bringing greater challenges to MLLMs. In addition, we propose an evaluation strategy called Positional Error Variance for assessing multiple-choice questions. The strategy aims to perform a quantitative analysis of position bias. We evaluate seven open-source MLLMs along with GPT4-V, Gemini-Pro, and Qwen-VL-Plus. The results demonstrate that CMMU poses a significant challenge to the recent MLLMs. The data and code are available at https://github.com/FlagOpen/CMMU.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
He et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5ee8cb6db643587583395 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2024/92
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
Zheqi He
Xinya Wu
Peng-Fei Zhou
Beijing Normal University
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...