Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
This paper examines the extent to which large language models (LLMs) have developed higher-order theory of mind (ToM); the human ability to reason about multiple mental and emotional states in a recursive manner (e.g. I think that you believe that she knows). This paper builds on prior work by introducing a handwritten test suite -- Multi-Order Theory of Mind Q&A -- and using it to compare the performance of five LLMs to a newly gathered adult human benchmark. We find that GPT-4 and Flan-PaLM reach adult-level and near adult-level performance on ToM tasks overall, and that GPT-4 exceeds adult performance on 6th order inferences. Our results suggest that there is an interplay between model size and finetuning for the realisation of ToM abilities, and that the best-performing LLMs have developed a generalised capacity for ToM. Given the role that higher-order ToM plays in a wide range of cooperative and competitive human behaviours, these findings have significant implications for user-facing LLM applications.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Street et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e67cc7b6db643587606e3f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2405.18870
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
Winnie Street
John Oliver Siy
Geoff Keeling
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...