Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
You have accessJournal of UrologyImaging/Uroradiology I (MP18)1 May 2024MP18-15 THE IMPACT OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING-DETECTED ZONAL LOCATION ON PROSTATE CANCER RECURRENCE: IMPLICATIONS FOR PREOPERATIVE RISK STRATIFICATION Kyle C. Schuppe, Alexander P. Kenigsberg, William S. Azar, Charles Hesswani, Sahil H. Parikh, Christopher Koller, Neil Mendhiratta, Sarah Azari, David G. Gelikman, Daniel Nethala, Sandeep Gurram, Baris Turkbey, and Peter A. Pinto Kyle C. SchuppeKyle C. Schuppe , Alexander P. KenigsbergAlexander P. Kenigsberg , William S. AzarWilliam S. Azar , Charles HesswaniCharles Hesswani , Sahil H. ParikhSahil H. Parikh , Christopher KollerChristopher Koller , Neil MendhirattaNeil Mendhiratta , Sarah AzariSarah Azari , David G. GelikmanDavid G. Gelikman , Daniel NethalaDaniel Nethala , Sandeep GurramSandeep Gurram , Baris TurkbeyBaris Turkbey , and Peter A. PintoPeter A. Pinto View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/01.JU.0001008672.83391.ed.15AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Preoperative prostate cancer risk-stratification is based on digital rectal exam-guided clinical stage, prostate specific antigen (PSA), and biopsy Grade Group (GG). These factors were validated in the pre-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) era. The role of specific MRI features in predicting recurrence of prostate cancer is an area of active investigation. This study aims to evaluate whether zonal anatomy on preoperative MRI has implications for biochemical recurrence (BCR). METHODS: Patients who underwent radical prostatectomy at a single institution between 2007 and 2023 were included. All patients underwent preoperative MRI, as per protocol. Patients who received neoadjuvant therapy or who had invisible lesions on MRI or lesions extending between zones were excluded. Patients with multiple lesions were categorized as transitional zone (TZ) or peripheral zone (PZ)-predominant based on the location of the lesion with the highest PI-RADS score. Lesion size was used to determine index lesion location if PI-RADS were equivalent. Univariate analyses were utilized to evaluate differences between the PZ and TZ groups. RESULTS: 624 patients underwent RARP, 461 of whom were included for analysis. 351 had PZ-predominant lesions and 110 had TZ lesions, with a median follow up of 50 and 40.5 months, respectively (p=0.026). Baseline characteristics are in Table 1. Those with TZ lesions were older (64 vs 62.5, p=0.03), had higher preop PSA (8.3 vs 6.4 ng/ml, p<0.01), higher PSA density (0.19 vs 0.15, p=0.02), and larger prostate size (45 vs 41cc, p=0.01) (Table 1). Patients with PZ lesions were more likely to have cT2+ disease (p<0.01). At two year follow-up, 46/351 (13.1%) of PZ and 8/110 (7.3%) of TZ groups experienced BCR (p=0.097). At five year follow-up, BCR was seen in 76/351 (21.7%) and 12/110 (10.9%) of PZ and TZ patients, respectively (p=0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Despite having higher age, PSA, and clinical T stage, those with PZ lesions had higher rates of BCR than those with TZ lesions. These findings suggest that MRI zonal anatomy may play a role in preoperative risk stratification and may allow for more precision in managing and counseling prostate cancer patients. Source of Funding: None © 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 211Issue 5SMay 2024Page: e306 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Metrics Author Information Kyle C. Schuppe More articles by this author Alexander P. Kenigsberg More articles by this author William S. Azar More articles by this author Charles Hesswani More articles by this author Sahil H. Parikh More articles by this author Christopher Koller More articles by this author Neil Mendhiratta More articles by this author Sarah Azari More articles by this author David G. Gelikman More articles by this author Daniel Nethala More articles by this author Sandeep Gurram More articles by this author Baris Turkbey More articles by this author Peter A. Pinto More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kyle C. Schuppe
Alexander P. Kenigsberg
William S. Azar
The Journal of Urology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Schuppe et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6f2aab6db64358766d7e2 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0001008672.83391.ed.15
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: