PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 2024BMJ Open7 citationsOpen Access

Intercostal nerve cryoablation versus thoracic epidural analgesia for minimal invasive Nuss repair of pectus excavatum: a protocol for a randomised clinical trial (ICE trial)

View Full Paper
NJNicky JanssenZuyderland Medisch CentrumJDJean H. T. DaemenZuyderland Medisch CentrumAFAimée J P M FranssenLjubljana University Medical Centre

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Epidural analgesia is currently considered the gold standard in postoperative pain management for the minimally invasive Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum. Alternative analgesic strategies (eg, patient-controlled analgesia and paravertebral nerve block) fail in accomplishing adequate prolonged pain management. Furthermore, the continuous use of opioids, often prescribed in addition to all pain management strategies, comes with side effects. Intercostal nerve cryoablation seems a promising novel technique. Hence, the primary objective of this study is to determine the impact of intercostal nerve cryoablation on postoperative length of hospital stay compared with standard pain management of young pectus excavatum patients treated with the minimally invasive Nuss procedure. This study protocol is designed for a single centre, prospective, unblinded, randomised clinical trial. Intercostal nerve cryoablation will be compared with thoracic epidural analgesia in 50 young pectus excavatum patients (ie, 12-24 years of age) treated with the minimally invasive Nuss procedure. Block randomisation, including stratification based on age (12-16 years and 17-24 years) and sex, with an allocation ratio of 1:1 will be performed.Postoperative length of hospital stay will be recorded as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include (1) pain intensity, (2) operative time, (3) opioid usage, (4) complications, including neuropathic pain, (5) creatine kinase activity, (6) intensive care unit admissions, (7) readmissions, (8) postoperative mobility, (9) health-related quality of life, (10) days to return to work/school, (11) number of postoperative outpatient visits and (12) hospital costs. This protocol has been approved by the local Medical Ethics Review Committee, METC Zuyderland and Zuyd University of Applied Sciences. Participation in this study will be voluntary and informed consent will be obtained. Regardless of the outcome, the results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed international medical journal. NCT05731973.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Janssen et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e764abb6db6435876da77dhttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081392
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Intercostal nerve cryoablation versus thoracic epidural analgesia for minimal invasive repair of pectus excavatum: a randomized clinical trial (ICE-trial)2026 · 1 citations
  2. 2Intercostal nerve cryoablation as an adjunct to the Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum: surgical technique and practical considerations2026
  3. 3Cryoanalgesia for Paediatric Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum: An Australian Retrospective Comparative Analysis2026
  4. 4One- versus Two-Minute Intercostal Nerve Cryoanalgesia in Children Undergoing Surgery for Funnel Chest Deformity2024
  5. 5Is cryoanalgesia superior to thoracic epidural analgesia for postoperative recovery after the nuss procedure? An updated meta-analysis2026