PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 12, 20250 citationsOpen Access

Automating the assessment of door-to-imaging time in stroke management using a clinical data warehouse

View Full Paper
OHOlivier HassanalyAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de ParisMDMatthieu DoutreligneSanté Publique FrancePTP. TroudeInstitut national d'études démographiques

Key Points

  • Automating the calculation of door-to-imaging time could greatly improve efficiency in stroke management.
  • The study analyzed over 6,000 medical records to validate the automation against manual EHR review.
  • Discrepancies between automated and manual methods highlight the challenges of human variability in data interpretation.
  • Structured and validated data are essential for effective automation within clinical settings.

Abstract

Abstract Assessment of quality and safety indicators (QSI) remains often based on time-consuming manual Electronic Health Record (EHR) review. Through a pilot study in stroke management, we investigated the feasibility of automating the calculation of one French national QSI, the measure of door-to-imaging time (DTI time) i.e. the time interval between the arrival at hospital and the first stroke diagnostic imaging, in a Clinical Data Warehouse (CDW) through a retrospective observational study of patients hospitalized in the Greater Paris University Hospitals (AP-HP) for an acute stroke in 2022. We automatically computed DTI time for more than 6,000 medical records in the CDW using a systematic approach, and validated this method by matching results against the manual AP-HP EHR review from the 2022 French national QSI audit. On this Study population, CDW and manual EHR review methods agreeed on estimating overall indicators, but showed discrepancies in the case-by-case analysis mainly because of human variability both in EHR completion and manual reviewing. Automation looks promising in a context of limited professional resources but requires structured and validated data, interoperability in the case of inter-institutional stays and validly measurable QSI.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hassanaly et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68ebe3d6becc64ad52fdad45https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7538212/v1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Automating the assessment of quality indicators using a clinical data warehouse: a pilot study on door-to-imaging time in stroke management2026
  2. 2ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1815 VARIABILITY IN MANUALLY REGISTERED DOOR TIME: IMPLICATIONS FOR STROKE QUALITY METRICS2026
  3. 3ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A959 WORKFLOW EFFICIENCY AND TIME-TO-TREATMENT IN ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE ACROSS A REGIONAL HEALTHCARE SYSTEM2026
  4. 4ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1434 COMPARISON BETWEEN MANUAL AND AUTOMATED MEASUREMENT OF STROKE THROMBOLYSIS WORKFLOW METRICS2026
  5. 5Abstract WP201: Lean, Fast, and Focused: Standardizing Stroke Activation to Optimize Door-to-Needle and Door-in-Door-Out Time2026