PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 16, 2025Cancer Research Communications2 citationsOpen Access

Molecular characterization of oncogenic gene fusions in a large real-world cohort of solid tumors

View Full Paper
LGLisa GaiBBBradley BowlesAHAdam J. Hockenberry

Key Points

  • Combined RNA- and DNA-NGS methodologies improved driver gene fusion detection by 21%, showing significant advantages over DNA-NGS alone.
  • Out of 67,278 patients, 2.2% had one of nine gene fusions detected; 21.1% had detectable RET or NTRK fusions with FDA approval.
  • Emerging fusion drivers linked to new therapies were identified in 218 patients, highlighting their potential beyond current FDA-approved indications.
  • This study reinforces the importance of using dual RNA- and DNA-NGS to enhance identification of clinically actionable fusions across diverse cancer types.

Abstract

Abstract Gene fusions are a class of important oncogenic drivers, with many matched FDA-approved targeted therapies across multiple solid tumors. However, the prevalence of fusions varies considerably by cancer type and assay. Fusion detection is technically challenging, and studies have shown that RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) can improve fusion detection rates when used in conjunction with DNA-based NGS. In this study, we performed a retrospective pan-cancer analysis of 67,278 patients receiving both RNA- and DNA-NGS in 43 distinct solid-tumor cancer types, including: NSCLC (18.6%), colorectal cancer (18.2%), and breast cancer (13.1%). In this cohort, 1497 patients (2.2%) had at least one of nine fusions detected—each having an FDA-approved matched therapy in at least one indication. Three hundred and sixteen patients (21.1%) had a fusion detected (RET or NTRK1/2/3) with matched-targeted therapy approved in all cancer indications. Concurrent RNA- and DNA-NGS increased the detection of driver gene fusions by 21% compared to DNA-NGS alone. Gene fusions were observed in a range of cancers beyond their approved cancer indications: of 1,501 fusions detected, 29% (n=437) were detected outside of an FDA-approved indication. Finally, emerging fusion drivers with targets in drug development were found in an additional 218 patients, with combined RNA- and DNA-NGS increasing detection of these variants by 127%. Our findings support combined RNA-NGS and DNA-NGS to maximize detection of clinically actionable fusions with FDA-approved matched therapies, and potentially actionable fusions in non-FDA-approved indications or those matched to therapies in clinical development.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gai et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f0ba59c50c73ebef9fa88fhttps://doi.org/10.1158/2767-9764.crc-25-0329
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Concurrent RNA- and DNA-NGS testing for the detection of clinically-relevant fusions in pediatric solid-tumor patients.2026
  2. 2Abstract 5424: Detection of rare oncogenic fusions through concurrent DNA and RNA next-generation sequencing in a pan-cancer clinical setting.2026
  3. 3Abstract 2991: Superior detection of NTRK fusions across Chinese solid tumors using amplicon-based DNA and RNA NGS co-detection compared with hybrid-capture DNA-NGS2026
  4. 4Effects of RNA-based NGS on false-positive fusion calls in colorectal cancer compared with DNA-NGS.2026
  5. 5Real-World Clinical Performance of a DNA-Based Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Assay for Detecting Targetable Fusions in Nonsquamous NSCLC2024 · 9 citations