PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 14, 2025Scientific Reports1 citationsOpen Access

Effects of rear-foot instability devices on lower-limb muscle activation during the Bulgarian split squat in male football players

View Full Paper
HTHüseyin TopçuAGAli Kamil GÜNGÖRYYYahya Yıldırım

Key Points

  • This research investigates the influence of rear-foot instability devices on muscle activation during bilateral and unilateral exercises.
  • Randomized crossover study design involving 23 trained male football players
  • Participants performed Bulgarian split squat using various instability devices
  • Surface electromyography recorded muscle activation during different phases of the exercise
  • Significantly increased activation of biceps femoris and semitendinosus during ascent with instability devices
  • Quadriceps activation highest using Swiss ball during descent
  • Distinct differences in muscle activation across various surfaces and phases of exercise

Abstract

Abstract Unilateral resistance exercises such as the Bulgarian Split Squat (BSS) are commonly used to develop lower-limb strength, postural control, and neuromuscular coordination, depending on training variables (e.g., load and intensity). Although instability training increases muscle activation, few studies have examined the effect of rearfoot instability on neuromuscular responses during BSS. This randomized crossover study investigated the acute effects of three rear-foot instability devices on muscle activation during the ascent and descent phases of the BSS in 23 trained male football players. Participants performed body-weight BSS under four conditions: stable platform, BOSU ball, Swiss ball (Swiss), and TRX suspension. Surface electromyography (sEMG) recorded activation of the rectus femoris (RF), vastus lateralis (VL), vastus medialis (VM), biceps femoris (BF), semitendinosus (ST), and gluteus maximus (GM). Two‑way repeated‑measures ANOVA showed significantly greater activation during ascent for BF ( p < 0.001), ST ( p = 0.006), VL ( p < 0.001), VM ( p < 0.001), and GM ( p < 0.001). Quadriceps activation during descent was highest on the Swiss: RF (Swiss vs. stable: p = 0.002; Swiss vs. BOSU: p < 0.001; Swiss vs. TRX: p = 0.006), VL (Swiss vs. stable: p = 0.017; Swiss vs. BOSU: p = 0.001), and VM (Swiss vs. stable: p = 0.024; Swiss vs. BOSU: p = 0.046). TRX increased ST activation during the ascent compared to the Swiss ( p = 0.034), and the BOSU showed higher ST activation than the Swiss during the descent ( p = 0.004). Surface significantly affected activation (ST: p = 0.018; RF: p < 0.001; VL: p < 0.001; VM: p = 0.013; GM: p = 0.042), and there was a significant surface × phase interaction for GM ( p = 0.041). The findings highlight rearfoot instability as an effective programming variable to selectively enhance muscle activation without external loading, supporting its application in strength and rehabilitation programs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Topçu et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6941aaa70f5af7fd17df4ae6https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-32203-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper