Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
This meta-analysis of 172 studies (N = 2,263 anxious,N = 1,768 nonanxious) examined the boundary conditions of threat-related attentional biases in anxiety. Overall, the results show that the bias is reliably demonstrated with different experimental paradigms and under a variety of experimental conditions, but that it is only an effect size of d = 0.45. Although processes requiring conscious perception of threat contribute to the bias, a significant bias is also observed with stimuli outside awareness. The bias is of comparable magnitude across different types of anxious populations (individuals with different clinical disorders, high-anxious nonclinical individuals, anxious children and adults) and is not observed in nonanxious individuals. Empirical and clinical implications as well as future directions for research are discussed.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yair Bar‐Haim
Dominique Lamy
Lee Pergamin
Psychological Bulletin
Tel Aviv University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bar‐Haim et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6979cdf0e26fb0ad0bb91b1f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.1
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: