Inicio
Explorar
nav.journalClub
Tendencias
Más
synapse
⌘+K
Idioma
Español
Español
Reply: non-significant results do not imply similarity or safety in NC-FET follicle-size comparisons: a clarification | Synapse
March 3, 2026
Open Access
Reply: non-significant results do not imply similarity or safety in NC-FET follicle-size comparisons: a clarification
JZ
J. Zhang
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
LW
Ling Wu
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Puntos clave
Non-significant results do not ensure safety or similarity in clinical outcomes, emphasizing caution in interpretation.
The commentary highlights the need for careful analysis of follicle size data in NC-FET contexts.
A clear distinction between statistical non-significance and clinical relevance is critical for patient safety.
Lack of significant findings should not be misinterpreted as a guarantee of safety; further investigation is necessary.
Leer artículo completo
externamente
Mark Helpful
Me gusta
Save
Guardar
Relay
Compartir
Ver artículo completo
Mark Helpful
Me gusta
Save
Guardar
Relay
Compartir
Ver artículo completo
Cite This Study
Copy
Zhang et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75eccc6e9836116a29bbe
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoag008