PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 7, 2026Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society1 citationsOpen Access

Chemical tagging with APOGEE, Gaia, MUSE, and HST: constraints on the formation of ω Centauri

View Full Paper
AMAndrew C MasonRSRicardo P SchiavonSKSebastian Kamann

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand the formation and chemical history of ω Centauri using various astronomical data.
  • Utilized data from APOGEE, Gaia, MUSE, and HST.
  • Analyzed stellar populations and their chemical compositions.
  • Compared chemical compositions with halo substructures from APOGEE DR17.
  • Identified three distinct stellar populations: metal-poor halo stars, globular cluster-like stars, and a second-generation population.
  • Observed varying metallicity and light-element abundance patterns indicating different formation processes.
  • Found no significant chemical association between ω Cen and known halo substructures.

Abstract

Abstract Current evidence suggests that ω Cen is the nuclear star cluster of a galaxy that merged with the Milky Way at early times. We use APOGEE, Gaia, MUSE, and HST data supplemented by galaxy chemical evolution models to place constraints on the assembly and chemical enrichment history of ω Cen. The APOGEE data reveal three stellar populations occupying separate loci on canonical chemical planes. One population resembles metal-poor halo field stars (P1), a second shows light-element abundance anti-correlations typical of metal-poor globular clusters (IM), and a third population (P2) is characterised by an extreme ”second-generation” abundance pattern. Both P1 and P2 populations cover a broad range of metallicity, consistent with extended histories of bursty star formation (SF), which is also evident from their light and α-element abundance patterns. Conversely, the IM stars exhibit a narrow metallicity spread, combined with Al-Mg, Na-O, and C-N anti-correlations resembling metal-poor Galactic globular clusters. Moreover, these three populations alone seem to account for the distribution of ω Cen stars in the chromosome map. We discuss these findings in the context of a scenario according to which ω Cen formed by a combination of in situ SF within the host galaxy (P1), followed by the spiralling in of gas-rich globular clusters (IM), leading to another burst of SF (P2). We perform a robust comparison of the chemical composition of ω Cen with those of halo substructures well represented in APOGEE DR17, finding no chemical associations to a high confidence level.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mason et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69abc2dc5af8044f7a4ec5e7https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stag433
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper