Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Abstract Several multiple imputation techniques are described for simple random samples with ignorable nonresponse on a scalar outcome variable. The methods are compared using both analytic and Monte Carlo results concerning coverages of the resulting intervals for the population mean. Using m = 2 imputations per missing value gives accurate coverages in common cases and is clearly superior to single imputation (m = 1) in all cases. The performances of the methods for various m can be predicted well by linear interpolation in 1/(m — 1) between the results for m = 2 and m = ∞. As a rough guide, to assure coverages of interval estimates within 2% of the nominal level when using the preferred methods, the number of imputations per missing value should increase from 2 to 3 as the nonresponse rate increases from 10% to 60%.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Donald B. Rubin
Nathaniel Schenker
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Harvard University
United States Census Bureau
Statistical Research (United States)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rubin et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d720f18a0e2c5879bef52c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1986.10478280
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: