PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 12, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Schrödinger's Cat Paradox and Realistic Interpretation from Particle Experiments

View Full Paper
JYJiaqing Yan

Key Points

  • The aim is to reinterpret Schrödinger's cat paradox in light of modern particle experiments.
  • Analysis of the Schrödinger's cat thought experiment.
  • Examination of modern double-slit experiments with single particles.
  • Discussion of measurement interference and its impact on observations.
  • Evaluation of wave properties in individual particles.
  • Interference patterns appear even with individual particles emitted one at a time.
  • Each particle showcases a unique and definite position and path.
  • Interference arises not from superposition but from inherent wave properties.

Abstract

Schrödinger's cat has long been interpreted by the mainstream as intuitive proof of quantum superposition, but its original intention was Schrödinger's irony and reduction to absurdity of the Copenhagen interpretation. This paper points out that the so-called quantum superposition is not the real physical state of microscopic particles, but the uncertainty phenomenon caused by limited observation methods and inevitable measurement interference. Modern double-slit experiments have realized the emission of single electrons and single photons one by one. Even if only one particle is emitted each time, interference fringes still appear after accumulation. This fact directly proves that each particle has a unique and definite position and path at any time, rather than a superposition state passing through double slits simultaneously. The fundamental reason why a single particle can produce interference is that the particle itself vibrates continuously and has wave properties, rather than a metaphysical superposition state. From the four aspects of original intention, experimental evidence, physical nature and logical judgment, this paper thoroughly clarifies the conceptual substitution of superposition, reveals the objective laws of reality, certainty and uniqueness in the microscopic world, and calls on physics to return to rationality, logic and common sense.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jiaqing Yan (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69db37df4fe01fead37c5f30https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19496295
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper