Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Nearly all tumors have multiple mutations in cancer-causing genes. Which of these mutations act in tandem with other mutations to drive malignancy and also provide therapeutic vulnerability? To address this fundamental question, we conducted a pan-cancer screen of co-mutation enrichment (looking for two genes mutated together in the same tumor at a statistically significant rate) using the AACR-GENIE 11.0 data (AACR, Philadelphia, PA, USA). We developed a web tool for users to review results and perform ad hoc analyses. From our screen, we identified a number of such co-mutations and their associated lineages. Here, we focus on the RB1/TP53 co-mutation, which we discovered was the most frequently observed co-mutation across diverse cancer types, with particular enrichment in small cell carcinomas, neuroendocrine carcinomas, and sarcomas. Furthermore, in many cancers with a substantial fraction of co-mutant tumors, the presence of concurrent RB1/TP53 mutations is associated with poor clinical outcomes. From pan-cancer cell line multi-omics and functional screening datasets, we identified many targetable co-mutant-specific molecular alterations. Overall, our analyses revealed the prevalence, cancer type-specificity, clinical significance, and therapeutic vulnerabilities of the RB1/TP53 co-mutation in the pan-cancer landscape and provide a roadmap forward for future clinical translational research.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ling Cai
Ralph J. DeBerardinis
Guanghua Xiao
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Cancers
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Southwestern Medical Center
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Cai et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69dbdfd59e6f14d6f1684952 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14174199
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: