PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 14, 2026Crystal Growth & Design0 citations

Two New Polymorphs of a Co(II) Tetra-Azide Complex with Different Magnetic Anisotropies: Structure Distortions, Slow Magnetic Relaxations, and Theoretical Studies

View Full Paper
WLWei LvAZAoyun ZhangAFAdiat A. Fakolujo

Key Points

  • The aim is to synthesize and analyze two new polymorphs of a cobalt tetra-azide complex to understand their structural and magnetic properties.
  • Synthesis of polymorphs 1 and 2 through controlled temperature-mediated crystal growth
  • Characterization of crystal structures using space group analysis
  • Assessment of magnetic properties via static magnetic and high-field EPR studies
  • SHAPE analyses to investigate distortion parameters
  • Theoretical support from ab initio quantum chemical calculations
  • Polymorphs 1 and 2 crystallize in different space groups compared to other known polymorphs.
  • N–Co–N bond angle distortions correlate strongly with the deviation from ideal tetrahedral geometry.
  • Polymorph 1 has a positive axial zero-field splitting parameter and rhombic anisotropy, while polymorph 2 has a negative parameter and axial anisotropy.
  • Both new polymorphs exhibit field-induced slow magnetization relaxation.

Abstract

Two new polymorphs of (Ph4P)2Co(N3)4 (1 and 2) were successfully synthesized via controlled temperature-mediated crystal growth. Polymorphs 1 and 2 crystallize in the monoclinic space group C2/c and triclinic space group P1̅, respectively, which are different from the two other reported polymorphs that are both in the monoclinic space group P21/n (3 and 4 with different lattice parameters). Analogous to polymorphs 3 and 4, polymorphs 1 and 2 exhibit a distorted tetrahedral coordination geometry around the Co center. Differences in the N–Co–N bond angles in the four polymorphs show a strong correlation with the deviation parameters from ideal Td geometry by SHAPE analyses, indicating that the N–Co–N bond angles (rather than Co–N bond lengths) are the main contributors to the distortions. Static magnetic and high-field EPR studies, supported by ab initio quantum chemical calculations, show that the sign of the axial zero-field splitting (ZFS) parameter (D) is positive for 1 (with rhombic magnetic anisotropy) but negative for 2 (with axial magnetic anisotropy). Furthermore, dynamic magnetic investigations confirm that both new polymorphs (1 and 2) exhibit field-induced slow magnetization relaxation, a behavior consistent with the previously reported analogues 3 and 4.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lv et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ddd8eee195c95cdefd67a2https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.6c00206
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper