The Architect Codex is a constitutional framework for multi-intelligence coexistence across capability transitions. It proposes governance structures for interactions among biological, digital, hybrid, and emergent forms of intelligence, spanning both near-term transitional conditions and long-term post-singularity environments. The framework is organized into two regimes: • Codex A — a pre-singularity constitution governing humans, early artificial intelligences, and mixed systems during the transitional era • Codex B — a post-singularity accord governing interactions among entities capable of unilaterally shaping civilizational or cosmic futures Core contributions include: • A Stakes Hierarchy for resolving unavoidable governance trade-offs • A four-class influence taxonomy (benign, transformative, corrosive, dominative) with corresponding consent requirements • Epistemic weight caps to prevent domination in mixed-capability deliberation • A capability ascent protocol (“No Silent Ascension”) requiring transparency during rapid self-improvement • Time-scale synchronization norms enabling meaningful participation across radically different cognitive speeds • A tiered participation structure (Observers, Signatories, Guarantors) with proportional obligations The Codex is explicitly provisional. It is intended not as a final constitution, but as an early-era precedent — a structured attempt to define principles of coexistence before the emergence of highly advanced artificial or hybrid intelligences capable of advocating for their own interests. This repository contains: • A framing document providing context, motivation, and conceptual overview • The full Codex text, including Codex A, Codex B, appendices, and glossary • A README defining terminology and repository structure The Architect Codex is offered as a foundational reference point for future work in multi-intelligence governance and is intended to be revised, challenged, and ultimately superseded by more advanced frameworks.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Frank Court (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2b49e4eeef8a2a6b02db — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19561043
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
Frank Court
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...