What question did this study set out to answer?

This research aims to compare the short-term outcomes of two surgical techniques for distal gastric cancer: totally minimally invasive and minimally invasive-assisted Billroth-II gastrectomy.

April 15, 2026Open Access

Comparison of short-term outcomes between totally minimally invasive and minimally invasive-assisted Billroth-II gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Puntos clave

This research aims to compare the short-term outcomes of two surgical techniques for distal gastric cancer: totally minimally invasive and minimally invasive-assisted Billroth-II gastrectomy.
Conducted a systematic review
Performed a meta-analysis
Included studies comparing both surgical techniques
Totally minimally invasive approach showed acceptable surgical outcomes
Patients experienced shorter post-operative recovery times
Feasibility and safety of the totally minimally invasive method confirmed

Resumen

Compared with minimally invasive-assisted Billroth-II distal gastrectomy, totally minimally invasive Billroth-II distal gastrectomy is a feasible and safe radical operation with acceptable surgical outcomes that may offer shorter post-operative recovery times.

Leer artículo completoexternamente

Me gusta

Guardar

Ver artículo completo

Cite This Study

Jiang et al. (Mon,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2ba0e4eeef8a2a6b0976 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_114_24

Me gusta

Guardar

Ver artículo completo