PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 10, 2016Environmental Science & Technology116 citations

Evidence for Coal Ash Ponds Leaking in the Southeastern United States

View Full Paper
JHJennifer S. HarknessUnited States Geological SurveyBSBarry SulkinAVAvner VengoshDuke University

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Coal combustion residuals (CCRs), the largest industrial waste in the United States, are mainly stored in surface impoundments and landfills. Here, we examine the geochemistry of seeps and surface water from seven sites and shallow groundwater from 15 sites in five states (Tennessee, Kentucky, Georgia, Virginia, and North Carolina) to evaluate possible leaking from coal ash ponds. The assessment for groundwater impacts at the 14 sites in North Carolina was based on state-archived monitoring well data. Boron and strontium exceeded background values of 100 and 150 μg/L, respectively, at all sites, and the high concentrations were associated with low δ(11)B (-9‰ to +8‰) and radiogenic (87)Sr/(86)Sr (0.7070 to 0.7120) isotopic fingerprints that are characteristic of coal ash at all but one site. Concentrations of CCR contaminants, including SO4, Ca, Mn, Fe, Se, As, Mo, and V above background levels, were also identified at all sites, but contamination levels above drinking water and ecological standards were observed in 10 out of 24 samples of impacted surface water. Out of 165 monitoring wells, 65 were impacted with high B levels and 49 had high CCR-contaminant levels. Distinct isotope fingerprints, combined with elevated levels of CCR tracers, provide strong evidence for the leaking of coal ash ponds to adjacent surface water and shallow groundwater. Given the large number of coal ash impoundments throughout the United States, the systematic evidence for leaking of coal ash ponds shown in this study highlights potential environmental risks from unlined coal ash ponds.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Harkness et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2bafd5404a0bea5924cahttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01727
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Boron and Strontium Isotopic Characterization of Coal Combustion Residuals: Validation of New Environmental Tracers2014 · 59 citations
  2. 2Leaching Characteristics of Arsenic and Selenium from Coal Fly Ash: Role of Calcium2009 · 77 citations
  3. 3The sedimentary cycle of the boron isotopes1987 · 368 citations
  4. 4Application of boron isotopes for identifying contaminants such as fly ash leachate in groundwater1993 · 95 citations
  5. 5Effects of seepage from fly-ash settling ponds and construction dewatering on ground-water levels in the Cowles Unit, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Indiana. Water-resources investigations (final) 1976-771979 · 2 citations