Knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding intraoral scanners among prosthodontists: A pilot cross-sectional study

Objectives: The objective of this survey was to evaluate the knowledge, awareness, and practice of intraoral scanners (IOSs) among prosthodontists in central India. Material and Methods: This observational study was conducted in the department of prosthodontics at a dental college and included prosthodontists in central India. Ethical approval was obtained from the institutional ethics committee before the commencement of the study. Responses exclusively from prosthodontists from central India only recorded. The questionnaire was formed and validated. Post validation questionnaire in the form Google Forms was circulated across central India for collecting responses. Data was recorded in an Excel sheet, and statistics were drawn. Results: Majority of the prosthodontists (96.3%) were aware of digital dentistry and IOSs, with 88.9% aware of different scan strategies. Most (74.1%) felt the scan strategy affects accuracy. Digital impressions were preferred sometimes by 77.8% and always by 18.5%. IOSs were mainly used for implants (51.9%), followed by fixed restorations, complete dentures, and maxillofacial prosthetics. Most of the respondents (74.1%) found scanners beneficial in daily practice, and 81.5% considered them a good investment. While 55.6% believed scanners may replace conventional techniques, opinions on handling and maintenance were divided. Conclusion: The study reveals a high level of awareness and positive attitude toward IOSs among prosthodontists in Central India. Most of the practitioners recognize their benefits in daily practice, particularly in implant and fixed prosthodontics. However, variations in usage, preferences, and perceptions – especially regarding scan strategies, maintenance, and long-term investment – highlight the need for continued training and support. While digital dentistry is rapidly advancing, conventional techniques still hold relevance, suggesting a transitional phase where both methods coexist in clinical practice.